Har, har, har.seaborgium wrote:I do accept that. I don't accept that this is a problem.Category 13 wrote:Accept that it asked for a year when the category was Historic Names. Not so much confusion, but clunky as hell. Either change the category or rewrite the clue.jeff6286 wrote:"In this year"...I don't really see where the confusion is coming from.BobF wrote:Anybody else find the wording of this one a bit clunky? My answer was "What is John in 1963?"
Friday, December 11, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall
- Category 13
- Wagering Viking
- Posts: 1912
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 1:43 pm
- Location: This side of paradise
Re: Friday, December 11, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 9:49 am
Re: Friday, December 11, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
I don't see a problem with that either. This time they asked a year related to a historic name. In this game they asked for a historic name related to a century. In this game the category was space exploration, but instead it was a geography question. The categories don't always indicate directly what they're looking for, that's why you need to rtfq, and the question wasn't ambiguous in the least.Category 13 wrote:Har, har, har.seaborgium wrote:I do accept that. I don't accept that this is a problem.Category 13 wrote:Accept that it asked for a year when the category was Historic Names. Not so much confusion, but clunky as hell. Either change the category or rewrite the clue.jeff6286 wrote:"In this year"...I don't really see where the confusion is coming from.BobF wrote:Anybody else find the wording of this one a bit clunky? My answer was "What is John in 1963?"
- opusthepenguin
- The Best Darn Penguin on the Whole JBoard
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:33 pm
- Location: Shawnee, KS
- Contact:
Re: Friday, December 11, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
I take acceptance to that.seaborgium wrote:I do accept that. I don't accept that this is a problem.Category 13 wrote:Accept that it asked for a year when the category was Historic Names. Not so much confusion, but clunky as hell. Either change the category or rewrite the clue.jeff6286 wrote:"In this year"...I don't really see where the confusion is coming from.BobF wrote:Anybody else find the wording of this one a bit clunky? My answer was "What is John in 1963?"