Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

This is where all of the games are discussed.

Moderators: alietr, econgator, dhkendall, trainman

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby seaborgium » Wed Feb 15, 2017 5:25 pm

MarkBarrett wrote:
Spoiler: show
$50,000
Though it might be difficult to operate, if the iPod Nano actually measured a nanometer across, it would be how wide?
A: 1 thousandth of a meter
B: 1 millionth of a meter
C: 1 billionth of a meter
D: 1 trillionth of a meter


Next:
Spoiler: show
During this week the players get a 4th lifeline to Cut the question and have it replaced with another one of the same value. That is what Josh did. The correct answer was: C: 1 billionth of a meter


I wonder whether this decision reflected
Spoiler: show
ignorance of what the "nano" prefix means
, or
Spoiler: show
a misunderstanding of the question as requiring knowledge of the iPod Nano's proportions.

If the latter,
Spoiler: show
he could/should have realized that no iPod has proportions of 1:1,000 or 1:1,000,000. I'm going to assume he just didn't know what "nano" meant.
seaborgium
Undefeated in Reruns
 
Posts: 4290
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 8:31 am

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby Volante » Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:15 pm

IronNeck wrote:Amusingly, the question he skipped (which simply required knowing what the prefix nano meant, very commonly used in science) was probably the easiest and quickest one.

How often were you exposed to 'nano-' by age 13, though?
User avatar
Volante
Harbinger of the Doomed Lemur
 
Posts: 4754
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:42 pm

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby seaborgium » Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:44 pm

Volante wrote:
IronNeck wrote:Amusingly, the question he skipped (which simply required knowing what the prefix nano meant, very commonly used in science) was probably the easiest and quickest one.

How often were you exposed to 'nano-' by age 13, though?

I'd heard of a nanosecond (and what it meant) before my age was double digits.
seaborgium
Undefeated in Reruns
 
Posts: 4290
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 8:31 am

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby MinnesotaMyron » Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:47 pm

seaborgium wrote:
MarkBarrett wrote:
Spoiler: show
$50,000
Though it might be difficult to operate, if the iPod Nano actually measured a nanometer across, it would be how wide?
A: 1 thousandth of a meter
B: 1 millionth of a meter
C: 1 billionth of a meter
D: 1 trillionth of a meter


Next:
Spoiler: show
During this week the players get a 4th lifeline to Cut the question and have it replaced with another one of the same value. That is what Josh did. The correct answer was: C: 1 billionth of a meter


I wonder whether this decision reflected
Spoiler: show
ignorance of what the "nano" prefix means
, or
Spoiler: show
a misunderstanding of the question as requiring knowledge of the iPod Nano's proportions.

If the latter,
Spoiler: show
he could/should have realized that no iPod has proportions of 1:1,000 or 1:1,000,000. I'm going to assume he just didn't know what "nano" meant.


Spoiler: show
I agree. It took me a couple re-reads to work out that "measured...across" and "how wide" were synonyms. From there it was easy.
MinnesotaMyron
Jeopardy! Champion
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:53 am

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby IronNeck » Wed Feb 15, 2017 9:48 pm

Volante wrote:
IronNeck wrote:Amusingly, the question he skipped (which simply required knowing what the prefix nano meant, very commonly used in science) was probably the easiest and quickest one.

How often were you exposed to 'nano-' by age 13, though?


I was probably 8 or 9 by the time I learned that "nano" was 10^-9. That's besides the point, though.

The 13 year-old on the show knew or reasoned out far more difficult questions that I would NOT have gotten at either 13 or even 23. He has played very well. So in that sense it's amusing that he skipped what was the easiest one of the lot.
IronNeck
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
 
Posts: 760
Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 11:26 pm

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby MarkBarrett » Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:29 pm

The 2/16 show opened with Josh Darrow returning to see this question:
Spoiler: show
$250,000 and no lifelines remaining
Image


Next:
Spoiler: show
Josh did not want to risk a guess even though he felt he could eliminate Denmark and Norway as being Scandinavian and too north. He walked with his $100,000 although of course Chris had him make a guess for fun. Josh said, "Netherlands" and would have been correct.


Next:
Spoiler: show
Uma Upamaka began play and did not use a lifeline until the $10,000 question.

In order to boast that their age is a prime number, a math-loving nonagenarian must be how old?
A: 91
B: 93
C: 97
D: 99


Next:
Spoiler: show
Uma did not know and would not/did not/could not figure it out, so used the CUT lifeline to play a new question. The correct answer was of course C: 97 and that was the one she thought it was not.


Next:
Spoiler: show
I've added these extra lines just to make it less obvious that Josh walked on the first question he saw. Uma knew the replacement Q for 10K and got the 20K one after using her 50:50 so she will return tomorrow with two lifelines remaining.
User avatar
MarkBarrett
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
 
Posts: 6219
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:37 am
Location: San Francisco

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby IronNeck » Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:52 pm

MarkBarrett wrote:The 2/16 show opened with Josh Darrow returning to see this question:
Spoiler: show
$250,000 and no lifelines remaining
Image


Next:
Spoiler: show
Josh did not want to risk a guess even though he felt he could eliminate Denmark and Norway as being Scandinavian and too north. He walked with his $100,000 although of course Chris had him make a guess for fun. Josh said, "Netherlands" and would have been correct.


Spoiler: show
Given the show's aversion to parting with prize money, I'm surprised the $250k clue ended up being reasonable. (I knew it cold) I was rooting for Josh to win a huge sum, too. Oh well, $100k is still an excellent haul, and very rare nowadays.

Also, I was probably much worse at trivia than Uma when I was in junior high, but I would have gotten that prime number question when I was 8 years old, let alone 13-14. That's because it's not trivia.
IronNeck
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
 
Posts: 760
Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 11:26 pm

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby alietr » Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:56 pm

Spoiler: show
Seriously. Leiden was an instaget. I would have doubled over laughing if I saw that as a $250K.
User avatar
alietr
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4835
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:20 pm
Location: Bethesda, MD

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby triviawayne » Thu Feb 16, 2017 6:41 pm

I've taken notice both kids weeks have been really heavy on the math questions
Total game show career losings = $171,522
User avatar
triviawayne
Got a Congratulations Email!
 
Posts: 692
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:50 pm

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby MinnesotaMyron » Thu Feb 16, 2017 6:56 pm

triviawayne wrote:I've taken notice both kids weeks have been really heavy on the math questions


Indeed. I suppose the contestant test selects for that. And speaking of which:

MarkBarrett wrote:
Next:
Spoiler: show
Uma Upamaka began play and did not use a lifeline until the $10,000 question.

In order to boast that their age is a prime number, a math-loving nonagenarian must be how old?
A: 91
B: 93
C: 97
D: 99


Next:
Spoiler: show
Uma did not know and would not/did not/could not figure it out, so used the CUT lifeline to play a new question. The correct answer was of course C: 97 and that was the one she thought it was not.



Spoiler: show
93 and 99 I can cast out threes to quickly see they aren't prime, but what's the quick way to know that 91 isn't? Maybe (49x2)-7? Is there a trickier way?
MinnesotaMyron
Jeopardy! Champion
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:53 am

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby Golf » Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:06 pm

MinnesotaMyron wrote:
Spoiler: show
93 and 99 I can cast out threes to quickly see they aren't prime, but what's the quick way to know that 91 isn't? Maybe (49x2)-7? Is there a trickier way?

Spoiler: show
Threes are obvious, fives are obvious, next step is to divide by 7. Done.

Not real hard regardless of age to divide by all odd numbers until reaching the halfway point. But perhaps that's not the obvious way to solve this simply?
Golf
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
 
Posts: 1218
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:27 pm

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby econgator » Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:42 pm

Golf wrote:
MinnesotaMyron wrote:
Spoiler: show
93 and 99 I can cast out threes to quickly see they aren't prime, but what's the quick way to know that 91 isn't? Maybe (49x2)-7? Is there a trickier way?

Spoiler: show
Threes are obvious, fives are obvious, next step is to divide by 7. Done.

Not real hard regardless of age to divide by all odd numbers until reaching the halfway point. But perhaps that's not the obvious way to solve this simply?


That's it. Odds can't have an even factor, so work your way up the odds like you said.
User avatar
econgator
Let's Go Mets!
 
Posts: 6647
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:32 am

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby IronNeck » Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:43 pm

Golf wrote:
MinnesotaMyron wrote:
Spoiler: show
93 and 99 I can cast out threes to quickly see they aren't prime, but what's the quick way to know that 91 isn't? Maybe (49x2)-7? Is there a trickier way?

Spoiler: show
Threes are obvious, fives are obvious, next step is to divide by 7. Done.

Not real hard regardless of age to divide by all odd numbers until reaching the halfway point. But perhaps that's not the obvious way to solve this simply?


Spoiler: show
Your method is fine. You only need to test numbers (at most) up to the whole square root of the number. That would mean up to 9 in this case, which is divisible by 3, which was already tested. So 7 is literally the last prime divisor one has to look at. And voila, 13*7= 91
IronNeck
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
 
Posts: 760
Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 11:26 pm

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby Bamaman » Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:16 pm

Spoiler: show
It is made easier as it obviously isn't divisible by 3 or 5.
Bamaman
Also Receiving Votes
 
Posts: 7898
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 12:39 pm

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby triviawayne » Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:47 pm

IronNeck wrote:
Golf wrote:
MinnesotaMyron wrote:
Spoiler: show
93 and 99 I can cast out threes to quickly see they aren't prime, but what's the quick way to know that 91 isn't? Maybe (49x2)-7? Is there a trickier way?

Spoiler: show
Threes are obvious, fives are obvious, next step is to divide by 7. Done.

Not real hard regardless of age to divide by all odd numbers until reaching the halfway point. But perhaps that's not the obvious way to solve this simply?


Spoiler: show
Your method is fine. You only need to test numbers (at most) up to the whole square root of the number. That would mean up to 9 in this case, which is divisible by 3, which was already tested. So 7 is literally the last prime divisor one has to look at. And voila, 13*7= 91


Not quite

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xkbQDEXJy2k
Total game show career losings = $171,522
User avatar
triviawayne
Got a Congratulations Email!
 
Posts: 692
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:50 pm

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby Vermonter » Fri Feb 17, 2017 6:18 pm

Golf wrote:
MinnesotaMyron wrote:
Spoiler: show
93 and 99 I can cast out threes to quickly see they aren't prime, but what's the quick way to know that 91 isn't? Maybe (49x2)-7? Is there a trickier way?

Spoiler: show
Threes are obvious, fives are obvious, next step is to divide by 7. Done.

Not real hard regardless of age to divide by all odd numbers until reaching the halfway point. But perhaps that's not the obvious way to solve this simply?

Spoiler: show
You don't even have to get to the halfway point – just to the "square root" point.
Hate bad wagering? Me too. Join me at The Final Wager.
User avatar
Vermonter
2003 College Champion
 
Posts: 1854
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:57 pm

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby MarkBarrett » Fri Feb 17, 2017 6:59 pm

Uma Upamaka returned on the 2/17 show and faced this question:
Spoiler: show
$30,000
Image


Next:
Spoiler: show
Image


Next:
Spoiler: show
Image
She left with $5,000 and her +1 unused. Yeah, thanks a lot audience.
User avatar
MarkBarrett
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
 
Posts: 6219
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:37 am
Location: San Francisco

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby bomtr » Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:43 pm

never ask the audience about geography. americans don't know shit about geography.
bomtr
Just a Man Like Any Other
 
Posts: 699
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:45 pm

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby IronNeck » Fri Feb 17, 2017 9:06 pm

Yikes. And I thought I was bad at geography. (Knew that one, though, and any adult should immediately be able to disqualify A and D)

Do you think some of the audience members might have been messing with her, though?
IronNeck
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
 
Posts: 760
Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 11:26 pm

Re: Millionaire 2016-17 Season Discussion [SPOILERS]

Postby Bamaman » Fri Feb 17, 2017 9:08 pm

Unless she did something to piss everyone off, I can't imagine why.
Bamaman
Also Receiving Votes
 
Posts: 7898
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 12:39 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Game Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Woof, Yahoo [Bot] and 10 guests

cron