Learned League 72  Official Thread
Moderators: alietr, dhkendall, trainman, econgator
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
I don't understand why the math question had such a low getrate. There's no time limit so just plug the numbers in until you get it...and it comes out to 2.7
 badgerfellow
 Loyal Jeopardista
 Posts: 104
 Joined: Sun May 15, 2016 2:44 pm
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
Looked like there were a few things off in the grading: http://learnedleague.com/viewtopic.php? ... 06#p101206boson wrote:Some answers were regraded after I first looked at the scores last night. My win turned into a tie. Does anyone know what question it wss? I hadn't looked closely to see what my opponent had wrong before.
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
Yep! Didn't even bother to plug a number in because, as someone else pointed out 3.1 on Q4 just works so well. My math stats pretty much guarantee me a 0 defense, so I would have lost either way.georgespelvin wrote:I was totally clueless on the Math question (as I almost always am), but thought that I was being clever by guessing Pi because of what day it was. My instinct on this was so strong that I even marked it as a two instead of a three for my opponent who was one for eight in Math (it did not affect the outcome). Anyone else out there guess Pi because yesterday was 3/14?
 This Is Kirk!
 Jeopardy! Champion
 Posts: 3072
 Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:35 am
 Location: Seattle
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
Agreed. I think it just looked so daunting lots of people didn't even bother. Of course you'd also need to know what the notation "lim n > infinity" meant.cf1140 wrote:I don't understand why the math question had such a low getrate. There's no time limit so just plug the numbers in until you get it...and it comes out to 2.7
 mcsheffrey
 Contributor
 Posts: 27
 Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 10:54 am
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
I was shocked to discover that my opponent with a .714 on Mathematics didn't make the effort to figure this one out. I solved for n=2 and n=3 then realized where it was headed. Before solving and without carefully parsing the question I had assumed it would converge on 0, 1, or infinity. Including the "if expressing the answer as a number" was a very useful hint.
 georgespelvin
 The Charlie Brown of Jeopardy Auditions
 Posts: 737
 Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:40 pm
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
Exactly. That's why I couldn't do it even if I had wanted to try.This Is Kirk! wrote:Agreed. I think it just looked so daunting lots of people didn't even bother. Of course you'd also need to know what the notation "lim n > infinity" meant.cf1140 wrote:I don't understand why the math question had such a low getrate. There's no time limit so just plug the numbers in until you get it...and it comes out to 2.7
I used to be AWSOP but wanted to be more theatrical.
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
I figured it was either 0, 1, e, or pi. The 'nearest decimal' part indicated it wasn't 0 or 1. A few calculations deep and I could see where it was going (though I will say that posing this question on Pi Day was serious negbait).mcsheffrey wrote:I was shocked to discover that my opponent with a .714 on Mathematics didn't make the effort to figure this one out. I solved for n=2 and n=3 then realized where it was headed. Before solving and without carefully parsing the question I had assumed it would converge on 0, 1, or infinity. Including the "if expressing the answer as a number" was a very useful hint.
 morbeedo
 Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
 Posts: 444
 Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 12:58 pm
 Location: New York, NY
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
I crushed calculus in high school and college, but sadly don't remember anything beyond algebra and geometry.
Like others, I plugged in the numbers and assumed the limit was 2.7, not remembering the irrational number e or realizing it was Pi day.
Got 1 point for my troubles and a win. Opponent went 0(0)
Went with middling instead of mediocre. How does ocre=mountain?
Like others, I plugged in the numbers and assumed the limit was 2.7, not remembering the irrational number e or realizing it was Pi day.
Got 1 point for my troubles and a win. Opponent went 0(0)
Went with middling instead of mediocre. How does ocre=mountain?
 ElendilPickle
 ToC Enabler
 Posts: 2199
 Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 12:53 am
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
My math percentage is abysmal. I looked at that question and was going to leave it blank because I have no idea what "lim n > infinity" means, except that I recognized the infinity symbol.This Is Kirk! wrote:Agreed. I think it just looked so daunting lots of people didn't even bother. Of course you'd also need to know what the notation "lim n > infinity" meant.cf1140 wrote:I don't understand why the math question had such a low getrate. There's no time limit so just plug the numbers in until you get it...and it comes out to 2.7
But I looked at the equation (if that's the word I want) and thought, "I wonder what happens if I plug in a number and just try doing the math?" So I did n = 2 and got 2.7. Trying it with n = 3 got me into places where I would have needed a calculator to get to the answer, so I quit trying that number.
Then I read the question again and thought, "Mathematical limit? What does that mean? I have no idea. Oh, well, maybe I should just submit 2.7. But that seems kind of simple....wait, today is March 14th. Could this be some other weird way of getting to pi, and I've missed something? That's certainly possible. I'll just put pi."
Hit "submit," and...
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
So, as I'm not mathematically inclined, and had no intention of trying to dredge up 20+ year old stale thoughts about how to make the calculation, I just went with this and let it go.
I'm living proof to show that a good attitude, a Southern accent, a ridiculous beard, and a middling amount of trivia knowledge can get you onto Jeopardy!

 Undefeated in Reruns
 Posts: 4346
 Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:31 am
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
See my post edit earlier about my opponent's 7(4) becoming a 7(5). That would make Eleanor Roosevelt the regraded question for my opponent.boson wrote:Some answers were regraded after I first looked at the scores last night. My win turned into a tie. Does anyone know what question it wss? I hadn't looked closely to see what my opponent had wrong before.
 Linear Gnome
 One Miner Gal
 Posts: 1279
 Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:55 am
 Location: Rolla, MO
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
This is only the second math question I've ever missed. I just read skullturf's solution (posted elsewhere); turns out that Calculus II methods are enough to get close, but you need more highpowered machinery to distinguish (rigorously) between two plausible lines of reasoning that lead to the correct answer of e and the incorrect answer of 2e (which was my answer). If I had calculated the expression for a few more n's, I could have gotten it right.
I was doubly irritated because yesterday was an unusually busy day and I spent some time on that question which took time away from other questions. The good news is that (unsurprisingly) I had been assigned a 0 for that question and I lost 3(2)7(5), so I don't think I was ever going to win the match.
I was doubly irritated because yesterday was an unusually busy day and I spent some time on that question which took time away from other questions. The good news is that (unsurprisingly) I had been assigned a 0 for that question and I lost 3(2)7(5), so I don't think I was ever going to win the match.

 Thrice Unplucked from the Jeopardy! Pool
 Posts: 535
 Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:51 am
 Location: Seattle
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
You're too kind. It was I who squeaked out the 4(3)4(4) tie, my first of two in a row (though in the second I got four right). Had I not punted the SaxeCoburg question in our match, I'd have had my firstever tie with identical defense.ElendilPickle wrote:I knew it wasn't O'Keeffe, but that was all I knew. Still managed to squeak out a tie with the alwaysformidable Reddpen.
Even knowing legend = dead left me with a 33333399 choice. Typed Tupac first, added Dr. Dre and Biggie Smalls, and finally went with Dre. Weren't all of them fromor at least recording inCalifornia? Not getting that one without, you know, actual knowledge, the kind one acquires by Googling before posting... such as that the dead one from Straight Outta Compton is EazyE, not Dre. So much fail...RichmondJ wrote:I think "California Love" would still have inclined me toward 2Pac. But I'm glad I didn't think about it that hard.seaborgium wrote:For what it's worth, though, the twentieth anniversary of Notorious B.I.G.'s murder was less than a week ago.RichmondJ wrote:Yeah, even *I* got that one, which is saying something. The key: "legend" = dead.seaborgium wrote:Lost 6(5)7(4) in public, tied 6(5)6(4) in private. My downfall was not appreciating how easy the Tupac question was when defending it against opponents with low pop music scores.
 BigDaddyMatty
 Save Me, Maggie!
 Posts: 2179
 Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:05 am
 Location: Rowlett, Texas
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
Tupac "2Pac" Shakur: From Oakland; started out as a roadie/backup dancer for Digital Underground (best known for "The Humpty Dance"); killed in a 1996 driveby shooting in Las Vegasreddpen wrote:Even knowing legend = dead left me with a 33333399 choice. Typed Tupac first, added Dr. Dre and Biggie Smalls, and finally went with Dre. Weren't all of them fromor at least recording inCalifornia? Not getting that one without, you know, actual knowledge, the kind one acquires by Googling before posting... such as that the dead one from Straight Outta Compton is EazyE, not Dre. So much fail...
Christopher "Biggie Smalls/The Notorious B.I.G." Wallace: From Brooklyn; top star of Sean "Puffy/Puff Daddy/P. Diddy/Diddy/Hey Diddle Diddle" Combs's Bad Boy Records label; killed in a 1997 driveby shooting in Los Angeles
Andre "Dr. Dre" Young: From Compton, CA; founding member of N.W.A.; gave Snoop Dogg and Eminem their big breaks; cofounder of Beats by Dre headphones, which was purchased by Apple in 2014 for $3.2 billion; very much alive
Eric "EazyE" Wright: From Compton, CA; founding member of N.W.A; died in 1995 due to AIDSrelated complications
Sprinkles are for winners.
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
Abysmal! That was my answer on Q6!ElendilPickle wrote:My math percentage is abysmal.
 skullturf
 Married to a Jeopardy! Champion
 Posts: 1726
 Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:34 am
 Location: Miami
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
Yes, I was going to mention here, just in case some folks are interested: The first thoughts I posted this morning are here and then my thoughts from a couple of hours later are here.Linear Gnome wrote:This is only the second math question I've ever missed. I just read skullturf's solution (posted elsewhere); turns out that Calculus II methods are enough to get close, but you need more highpowered machinery to distinguish (rigorously) between two plausible lines of reasoning that lead to the correct answer of e and the incorrect answer of 2e (which was my answer).
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
I tried solving it analytically, but gave up after a few minutes. This is one question where actually plugging in numbers and seeing where it converges is way easier than the full solution. The problem had already converged to be rounded to 2.7 once you have plugged 3 in the solution. Being a masochist, I did 2, 3, 4 and somehow thought figuring out 10 would be easy (it was tedious).skullturf wrote:Yes, I was going to mention here, just in case some folks are interested: The first thoughts I posted this morning are here and then my thoughts from a couple of hours later are here.Linear Gnome wrote:This is only the second math question I've ever missed. I just read skullturf's solution (posted elsewhere); turns out that Calculus II methods are enough to get close, but you need more highpowered machinery to distinguish (rigorously) between two plausible lines of reasoning that lead to the correct answer of e and the incorrect answer of 2e (which was my answer).
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
Or you were me, who didn't start trying to do math until past my bedtime and even simple fractions turned into an enormous mess. If I didn't know Eleanor Roosevelt yesterday, I would have pulled a 0. Ooof. That did a great job getting my projected TCA back to normal. I just wish it didn't hurt so much!This Is Kirk! wrote:Agreed. I think it just looked so daunting lots of people didn't even bother. Of course you'd also need to know what the notation "lim n > infinity" meant.cf1140 wrote:I don't understand why the math question had such a low getrate. There's no time limit so just plug the numbers in until you get it...and it comes out to 2.7
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
I didn't make it all the way through it, but even 10 wasn't too too hard. It was basically (10/9)^9*10. 10/9=1.11, so multiply that out 9 times. But yes, 3 showed where the convergence was pretty quickly.boson wrote:Being a masochist, I did 2, 3, 4 and somehow thought figuring out 10 would be easy (it was tedious).
 ElendilPickle
 ToC Enabler
 Posts: 2199
 Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 12:53 am
Re: Learned League 72  Official Thread
I'd listen to songs whose titles start with abysmal  well, all except for Abba.econgator wrote:Abysmal! That was my answer on Q6!ElendilPickle wrote:My math percentage is abysmal.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], clprez, jfrumkin, morbeedo, This Is Kirk!, xxaaaxx, Yahoo [Bot] and 24 guests