Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall
Bamaman wrote:You are within striking distance of a lock and you don't go for it on a late DD? at least everyone made it to FJ today.
Instaget FJ
Austin Powers wrote:DJ went pretty smooth, they didn't have any incredible gets (well LA went well enough, I thought, on questions like Laura Ashley) but no painful misses ("Avatar" maybe). I said Hector and Achilles for the duel - almost makes sense, but I think if the category was run in correct order I would have realized what they really wanted there. That's the type of academic category that I wish we would have seen more of.
If I got the number correct, the champ didn't bet enough to catch up to the leader if the leader missed on a lockout bet. Hey, it's not my money.
xxaaaxx wrote:Bamaman wrote:You are within striking distance of a lock and you don't go for it on a late DD? at least everyone made it to FJ today.
Instaget FJ
That about covers it, though I'll admit, I did the math at least 3 times to make sure I wasn't missing some sort of trick.
ETA:Austin Powers wrote:DJ went pretty smooth, they didn't have any incredible gets (well LA went well enough, I thought, on questions like Laura Ashley) but no painful misses ("Avatar" maybe). I said Hector and Achilles for the duel - almost makes sense, but I think if the category was run in correct order I would have realized what they really wanted there. That's the type of academic category that I wish we would have seen more of.
If I got the number correct, the champ didn't bet enough to catch up to the leader if the leader missed on a lockout bet. Hey, it's not my money.
I said Paris...and Agamemnon. Obviously I need to read them again![]()
IIRC, champ had 10400, bet 7000, and ended with 17400, leader had 19000, so a shutout bet takes him down to 17199. All the champ's wager did was ensure he'd win 3400 less if he won, but it wasn't a bad wager.
StevenH wrote:FJ was just a matter of doing the math, and I got to 1792+72=1864=Lincoln.
TenPoundHammer wrote:How the hell is "guest host" an oxymoron? Urban Cowboy was also a stretch there IMO
marpocky wrote:StevenH wrote:FJ was just a matter of doing the math, and I got to 1792+72=1864=Lincoln.
Lucky you, since Washington's (and Lincoln's) inaugural address were both 3 years earlier than that.
Austin Powers wrote:So the champ started strong but the other guy made his move starting the bands category. But all in all I thought it was a very good J, much better than what we witnessed yesterday. There didn't seem like anything that the players should have gotten but not, though perhaps Australian rules football after the first answer was ruled incorrect (the champ had a couple of unusual fumbles today). I wasn't surprised to see Balanchine missed, but that's a great bottom row DD. Classic show material there.
Rough spots I hit included a couple in the fast food (just don't eat it much, but still got three of them), and in the international category - for example, I was thrown off by the wording on the Swiss Bank Account question, which was strangely worded, I thought.
DJ went pretty smooth, they didn't have any incredible gets (well LA went well enough, I thought, on questions like Laura Ashley) but no painful misses ("Avatar" maybe). I said Hector and Achilles for the duel - almost makes sense, but I think if the category was run in correct order I would have realized what they really wanted there. That's the type of academic category that I wish we would have seen more of.
I laughed out loud at the WKRP question.
If I got the number correct, the champ didn't bet enough to catch up to the leader if the leader missed on a lockout bet. Hey, it's not my money. (ETA I had the champ's initial amount wrong).
As for the question itself, I could see someone flipping out - OMGMATH - but really all it was asking was name a famous president around 1860. Ok, I will say Lincoln.
It was awesome to see the guy hunt for DDs late - such awareness is unusual lately - but strange to see him not bet to lock, even if he correctly surmised that he would probably be wrong.
Austin Powers wrote:
As for the question itself, I could see someone flipping out - OMGMATH - but really all it was asking was name a famous president around 1860. Ok, I will say Lincoln.
davey wrote:Austin Powers wrote:
As for the question itself, I could see someone flipping out - OMGMATH - but really all it was asking was name a famous president around 1860. Ok, I will say Lincoln.
Someone flipping out about the math? Oh, that could never happen...Unless someone said, Of course it's Lincoln, but I better do the math, easiest thing go forward 100, 1889, now back 30 years, 1859...and then I subtracted 2 more years, and thought Oh, a trick, Buchanan! (Aren't all presidents famous...?) I am suitably chastened about the bad things I said about the contestants yesterday...And the truth is, the remaining seconds still left plenty of time to count forward, like a normal person...
zakharov wrote:Did Alex seem to be a particularly jolly mood to anyone else?
StevenH wrote:FJ was just a matter of doing the math, and I got to 1792+72=1864=Lincoln.
Users browsing this forum: alietr, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 6 guests