Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall
- ElendilPickle
- ToC Enabler
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 12:53 am
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
I went with Concord. :::sigh::: I'm 0/4 for FJ so far this week.
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
Reminds me of the FIVE YEARS of back-and-forth, circular discussion on Wikipedia regarding "Halifax, Nova Scotia" being a highly confusing disambiguation page. (At one point, it actually had both "This article should be merged to ____" and "This article should have content from ____ merged to it" maintenance tags.) Years and years of on-again, off-again discussion that went nowhere before it was finally fixed with a simple redirect that anyone who can use a keyboard could've done. And it must've been the right move, because no one's debated it.bpmod wrote:Here in Ontario, there are distinctions between cities and towns, but not based on some predetermined definitions. There are minimum requirements (population being one) before a municipality can apply (to whom, I don't know) for town-ship (which is different from township-ship) or city-ship, but nothing says they have to apply when they meet those minimums.
But the weirdest thing about Ontario is our equivalent of what most people know as a county. Here we have cities named county (such has (the City of) Haldimand County, just south of Hamilton). We have Regional Municipalities, such as Niagara, immediately to the east of Hamilton. We have districts (mostly up north where no human (other than dhkendall) has ever set foot). And we have 'real' counties (although I can't name one off the top of my head). Some places are two-tier (meaning 4 levels of government) and others are one-tier (meaning three levels).
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 2189
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:18 am
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
I've lived in NJ, CT and Il, and as far as I know, all have a definition of "city" based on articles of incorporation. I live in a city in IL that is smaller in population than the "town" I lived in in CT. I guessed Plymouth for FJ and did try to figure out if it was a city or a town.
Lots of easy categories tonight. Burst out laughing at the Exxon Valdez answer.
Lots of easy categories tonight. Burst out laughing at the Exxon Valdez answer.
-
- Rank
- Posts: 5424
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:26 pm
- Location: Hamilton Ontario
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
What was the issue with Halifax?TenPoundHammer wrote:Reminds me of the FIVE YEARS of back-and-forth, circular discussion on Wikipedia regarding "Halifax, Nova Scotia" being a highly confusing disambiguation page. (At one point, it actually had both "This article should be merged to ____" and "This article should have content from ____ merged to it" maintenance tags.) Years and years of on-again, off-again discussion that went nowhere before it was finally fixed with a simple redirect that anyone who can use a keyboard could've done. And it must've been the right move, because no one's debated it.
Oh, and disregard everything I said in my previous post relating to any Ontario provinical government. We currently do not have one (and won't until January at the earliest).
Brian
...but the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
- dhkendall
- Pursuing the Dream
- Posts: 8789
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:49 am
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
- Contact:
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
Perhaps, but the thing is, you'd pretty much have to word it that way because if you changed "county" to "parish", then you're giving away the answer, and it's not even the Stupid Answers category! "County" seems to include the parishes of Louisiana and the boroughs of Alaska by common use (just as "state" includes the "commonwealths" of Kentucky, Virginia, Maryland, and Massachusetts, since they are completely indistinguishable from the other 46 states (but very different from the "commonwealths" of Puerto Rico and the Northern Mariana Islands, since they are a different type of commonwealth).opusthepenguin wrote:Similarly, I think we'd be pretty ticked off if a clue began, "A county in this state..." and they were going for "What is Louisiana?"
Well, part of the reason I love this board, and my biggest beef with the old Sony board (and looks like the same problem on the new Sony board, but I'm not a registered user there) is that this board has dedicated and hard-working moderators that do catch things like that, whereas the Sony moderators didn't do much. (And, btw, I came to this opinion of our moderators before I was asked to be one, needless to say I was quite honoured when the invite came. It was also an eye-opener, seeing "behind the curtain" as it were.pinkfreud wrote:There may appear to be a legion of outraged posters on the Sony board, but I suspect that there may be only one person behind the numerous usernames. It would be interesting to see the IP information.
I used to be a moderator on a large messageboard, and we frequently had flurries of new users who were actually one person. When registering a new identity is simple, hydra-headed posters tend to emerge to agree with themselves.
It was mentioned that this "outrage" is also carrying on on the Jeopardy! Facebook page (the very few times I've been there (less times than I've lurked at the new Sony board) it seems the makeup there is exactly the same as at the new Sony board), and it's very hard to create sock puppets to just agree with you on Facebook, so I'd say the "outrage" in both places is genuine. (Besides, after being a moderator myself for a while now, I'd like to say I've developed a keen eye for spotting socks, and my "sock sense" isn't tingling when I read the Sony discussions.)
BTW, visiting the website of the town of Lexington, its town government page speaks of the same things that marpocky mentioned (ie board of selectmen rather than a mayor and council), and "Town of Lexington" is all over the site, so I don't think "city" is the right term for it, but it does seem to be a catchall (like "county" including "boroughs" and "parishes" and "state" including "commonwealths" since the smaller terms are indistinguishable from the larger group). So, yes, they are technically correct [Number 1.0]"The best kind of correct!"[/Number 1.0], but Jeopardy! is not in the wrong for doing that.
Question still remains though is if the word "city" did actually lead a contestant astray, and the *only* way to solve that is to have the two contestants in question come here.
"Jeopardy! is two parts luck and one part luck" - Me
"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings
Follow my progress game by game since 2012
"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings
Follow my progress game by game since 2012
- dhkendall
- Pursuing the Dream
- Posts: 8789
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:49 am
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
- Contact:
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
Want one? You can have ours!bpmod wrote:Oh, and disregard everything I said in my previous post relating to any Ontario provinical government. We currently do not have one (and won't until January at the earliest).
"Jeopardy! is two parts luck and one part luck" - Me
"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings
Follow my progress game by game since 2012
"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings
Follow my progress game by game since 2012
-
- Rank
- Posts: 5424
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:26 pm
- Location: Hamilton Ontario
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
I was gonna say anything's better than what we had... but come to think of it, nothing is just fine. Too bad everybody that was in office when Dalty-boy up and quit is still being paid. It would be nice if we at least saved some money to pay back Newfoundland* for all the support they've given us over the past 8 years or so.dhkendall wrote:Want one? You can have ours!bpmod wrote:Oh, and disregard everything I said in my previous post relating to any Ontario provinical government. We currently do not have one (and won't until January at the earliest).
*and others too, of course
Brian
...but the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
That both "Halifax" and "Halifax, Nova Scotia" were disambiguation pages containing the same information, although the latter was a lot less clear about the odd permutations of Halifax's government. Read the talk page.bpmod wrote:What was the issue with Halifax?TenPoundHammer wrote:Reminds me of the FIVE YEARS of back-and-forth, circular discussion on Wikipedia regarding "Halifax, Nova Scotia" being a highly confusing disambiguation page. (At one point, it actually had both "This article should be merged to ____" and "This article should have content from ____ merged to it" maintenance tags.) Years and years of on-again, off-again discussion that went nowhere before it was finally fixed with a simple redirect that anyone who can use a keyboard could've done. And it must've been the right move, because no one's debated it.
- earendel
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 767
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:22 pm
- Location: mired in the bureaucracy
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
The "April 19" part of the FJ! clue led me to Lexington right away - didn't even give a single thought to Concord. I'll agree with the others who had no idea who Gigi Granger was. I felt sorry for the contestant who said "Exxon Valdez" rather than "Exxon Mobil".
"Elen sila lumenn omentielvo...A star shines on the hour of our meeting."
-
- Also Receiving Votes
- Posts: 12897
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 1:39 pm
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
Apparently in Alabama you need 2,000 people to be a city.
http://www.shelbycountyreporter.com/201 ... ther-city/
http://www.shelbycountyreporter.com/201 ... ther-city/
- ChemTeacher
- J! Teachers Tournament 2012-B
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:27 pm
- Location: Charlottesville, VA
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
I have e-mailed all three of them to ask if they were confused about "city" vs. "town." I'll let you know if I hear anything.dhkendall wrote:Question still remains though is if the word "city" did actually lead a contestant astray, and the *only* way to solve that is to have the two contestants in question come here.
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:57 am
- Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
If they didn't mention "New England", I would have guessed Oklahoma City (my hometown---due to April 19,1995).
- alietr
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8981
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:20 pm
- Location: Bethesda, MD
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
Well, I went with Plymouth (thinking about the date on the rock). Had no clue what the date of the battles was, and it sounded like a new beginning sort of thing. Oh well. As for people claiming that they could have known all of the facts that would lead them to Lexington but not answer Lexington because they know that's a town and not a city ... well, that's pretty ridiculous in my book. Just sayin'. (Oops, gotta be careful with those missing g's.)
And I just have to comment on the name "Francesca Leibowitz". I realize it is probably her married name, but it tickles me pink for some reason. At least her first name isn't Fawn.
And I just have to comment on the name "Francesca Leibowitz". I realize it is probably her married name, but it tickles me pink for some reason. At least her first name isn't Fawn.
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 2189
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:18 am
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
I'd agree, but I also think that using the term "city" in the category title would lead some people to think of, well, cities in New England, not small towns and would cause people to limit the scope of the possible answers they would consider.As for people claiming that they could have known all of the facts that would lead them to Lexington but not answer Lexington because they know that's a town and not a city ... well, that's pretty ridiculous in my book
- econgator
- Let's Go Mets!
- Posts: 10673
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:32 am
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
And on the other end, there's Hempstead, NY, a town of nearly 750,000 people (it would be the 16th largest city were it actually called a city).Bamaman wrote:Apparently in Alabama you need 2,000 people to be a city.
http://www.shelbycountyreporter.com/201 ... ther-city/
- BobF
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 2180
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 3:03 pm
- Location: All over the east coast
- Contact:
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
Not a problem for Loch Arbour. (I grew up in the town where their kids went to high school and there aren't even 25 intersections in that village).Roadgeek Adam wrote:Last I looked, most states have in definition laws for municipal levels.
Here in Jersey, of the 3 villages that exist, there are certain restrictions. The most hilarious one is no more than 25 traffic lights in your village.
Was once hugged by Maggie Speak!
- alietr
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8981
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:20 pm
- Location: Bethesda, MD
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
Yeah, there is a hierarchy in New York. I grew up in the Village of Lawrence which is in the Town of Hempstead which is in Nassau County. When I was growing up, the Town of Hempstead was more populous than something like seven states.econgator wrote:And on the other end, there's Hempstead, NY, a town of nearly 750,000 people (it would be the 16th largest city were it actually called a city).Bamaman wrote:Apparently in Alabama you need 2,000 people to be a city.
http://www.shelbycountyreporter.com/201 ... ther-city/
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:11 am
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
I thought I was so smart on this one. I remembered "...the 18th of April in '75; hardly a man is now alive who remembers that famous day and year...." and thought THAT was the date of the Battle of Lexington, with Concord the following day.econgator wrote:
For FJ, I considered Lexington and Concord -- and very brefily West Quoddy Head, ME, where sunlight first hits our shores, but that's way too obscure -- and settled on Lexington, as I know that April 19th is the day of the Battle and Lexington comes first in the name of it.
Boo, hiss. The 18th (Patriot's Day, until September 11 came to be called that) was the date of Paul Revere's ride, with BOTH Lexington and Concord the following day.
My guess of Concord was right war, right geographic area, right day, wrong reason, and (presumably) not the right city, since (again presumably) their city seal does not also have that date on it. Off by JUST THAT MUCH.
- opusthepenguin
- The Best Darn Penguin on the Whole JBoard
- Posts: 10319
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:33 pm
- Location: Shawnee, KS
- Contact:
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
You're the first one to favor Concord over Lexington! As those of us who made the right guess have reported, we didn't have any brilliant reasoning to break the tie between the two ... towns. What was your thought process in going with the other one?ElendilPickle wrote:I went with Concord. :::sigh::: I'm 0/4 for FJ so far this week.
- adifferentguy
- Just Starting Out on JBoard
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:44 am
Re: Thursday, November 8, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
Oh, how right you are. And good looking too!pinkfreud wrote:There may appear to be a legion of outraged posters on the Sony board, but I suspect that there may be only one person behind the numerous usernames. It would be interesting to see the IP information.
I used to be a moderator on a large messageboard, and we frequently had flurries of new users who were actually one person. When registering a new identity is simple, hydra-headed posters tend to emerge to agree with themselves.