Pet Intellectual Peeves
Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall
-
- Rank
- Posts: 5424
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:26 pm
- Location: Hamilton Ontario
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
Maybe it's the programmer in me that needs correct syntax and total lack of ambiguity. But I can't help but wonder why we have proper grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, etc. if "everybody understands what [you] mean anyway". And when we are learning, we are told not to assume anything, but then we have to assume with every sentence that is uttered or written.
If I were to write a line of computer code whose English equivalent would be along the lines of "me tarzan you jane", the parser would spit it back out at me and not (be able to) do anything with it. But it has become perfectly acceptable for educated (and non-educated) people to not know the difference between a subject and an object (for instance). And, the funny thing is, I have heard the worst usage of English, of all places, in the school staff room. Things like "Give that form to myself when you are done." or "Mary brought those cookies for I because she knew I like them." Of course, I also had lots of fun with the children in the classroom too... "Sir, can I go to the bathroom?" to which I would answer "You would know your ability better than I would."
Brian
If I were to write a line of computer code whose English equivalent would be along the lines of "me tarzan you jane", the parser would spit it back out at me and not (be able to) do anything with it. But it has become perfectly acceptable for educated (and non-educated) people to not know the difference between a subject and an object (for instance). And, the funny thing is, I have heard the worst usage of English, of all places, in the school staff room. Things like "Give that form to myself when you are done." or "Mary brought those cookies for I because she knew I like them." Of course, I also had lots of fun with the children in the classroom too... "Sir, can I go to the bathroom?" to which I would answer "You would know your ability better than I would."
Brian
...but the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
- Magna
- Hooked on Jeopardy
- Posts: 3079
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 2:37 pm
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
Fwiw, most retail establishments do this - which, as a customer, I don't mind at all!Paucle wrote:I brought the order in to the manager to ask if they got both discounts and she said yes, first take the membership off and put that total here, then use that total and do the group rate discount here "So yes they get a full 40% off."
Now I was confused. "Wait, take both off the top and add the discounts together?"
-
- Rank
- Posts: 5424
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:26 pm
- Location: Hamilton Ontario
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
No. At least in my case, it's because I went to school and I learned what was correct and incorrect. And if things have changed since I learned them, I don't have the opportunity (or the stamina) to keep up with the changes.Vanya wrote:The point is, you have no basis for objecting to different than or awhile or alot, other than (!) the fact that you don't like them.
Brian
...but the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
- Paucle
- Trekardy! Writer
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:36 pm
- Location: near Albany NY
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
My point being, WE didn't. She was showing me a procedure that conflicted with the math. If she wanted me to give them 40% off, she needed to show me a different way to fill out the form.Magna wrote:Fwiw, most retail establishments do this - which, as a customer, I don't mind at all!Paucle wrote:I brought the order in to the manager to ask if they got both discounts and she said yes, first take the membership off and put that total here, then use that total and do the group rate discount here "So yes they get a full 40% off."
Now I was confused. "Wait, take both off the top and add the discounts together?"
- trainman
- Moderator Extraordinaire
- Posts: 1599
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:27 pm
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
They don't really do this on the TV news in Buffalo, do they?bpmod wrote:But we keep hearing about the couple in Buffalo watching the evening newscast...
TV: And now, the weather. Current temperature 32 in Buffalo, 30 in the Southtowns, 27 out by the airport, 34 in Niagara Falls and 0 across the border in Fort Erie.
-
- Rank
- Posts: 5424
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:26 pm
- Location: Hamilton Ontario
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
I really have to use more emoticons.trainman wrote:They don't really do this on the TV news in Buffalo, do they?bpmod wrote:But we keep hearing about the couple in Buffalo watching the evening newscast...
TV: And now, the weather. Current temperature 32 in Buffalo, 30 in the Southtowns, 27 out by the airport, 34 in Niagara Falls and 0 across the border in Fort Erie.
Actually, the entire story is one made up by my friends and me with the thought "What if the US weather broadcasts got our temperatures 'right'?"
Brian
...but the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
- dhkendall
- Pursuing the Dream
- Posts: 8789
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:49 am
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
- Contact:
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
I'm sure I have seen this done on printed maps (either in the newspaper or on static maps on, say, the Weather Channel that don't have a talking head in front of it), where the other temperature (either F or C) for the Canuck temps, is bracketed.bpmod wrote:I really have to use more emoticons.trainman wrote:They don't really do this on the TV news in Buffalo, do they?bpmod wrote:But we keep hearing about the couple in Buffalo watching the evening newscast...
TV: And now, the weather. Current temperature 32 in Buffalo, 30 in the Southtowns, 27 out by the airport, 34 in Niagara Falls and 0 across the border in Fort Erie.
Actually, the entire story is one made up by my friends and me with the thought "What if the US weather broadcasts got our temperatures 'right'?"
Brian
"Jeopardy! is two parts luck and one part luck" - Me
"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings
Follow my progress game by game since 2012
"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings
Follow my progress game by game since 2012
- billy pilgrim
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
Well maybe it was -40 ?bpmod wrote:I really have to use more emoticons.trainman wrote:They don't really do this on the TV news in Buffalo, do they?bpmod wrote:But we keep hearing about the couple in Buffalo watching the evening newscast...
TV: And now, the weather. Current temperature 32 in Buffalo, 30 in the Southtowns, 27 out by the airport, 34 in Niagara Falls and 0 across the border in Fort Erie.
Actually, the entire story is one made up by my friends and me with the thought "What if the US weather broadcasts got our temperatures 'right'?"
Brian
She caught the Katy and left me a mule to ride.
- Paucle
- Trekardy! Writer
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:36 pm
- Location: near Albany NY
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
I can calculate that! Probably F, so need C. Subtract 32 negative 72 divide by 9 is negative 8 multiply by hey WAITAMINNITbilly pilgrim wrote:Well maybe it was -40 ?
Must've gotten it backwards... Need F! Divide by 5 negative 8 multiply by nine negative 72 add 32, neg for... hey WAITAMINNIT!
What kind of nonsense is this?? Are these conversion formulas correct or not?
-
- Rank
- Posts: 5424
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:26 pm
- Location: Hamilton Ontario
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
And when it's colder than that, all of the USians want to move up here.billy pilgrim wrote:Well maybe it was -40 ?bpmod wrote:Actually, the entire story is one made up by my friends and me with the thought "What if the US weather broadcasts got our temperatures 'right'?"
Brian
Brian
...but the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
-
- Rank
- Posts: 5424
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:26 pm
- Location: Hamilton Ontario
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
They can't possibly be if -40 is twice as cold as -20.Paucle wrote:I can calculate that! Probably F, so need C. Subtract 32 negative 72 divide by 9 is negative 8 multiply by hey WAITAMINNITbilly pilgrim wrote:Well maybe it was -40 ?
Must've gotten it backwards... Need F! Divide by 5 negative 8 multiply by nine negative 72 add 32, neg for... hey WAITAMINNIT!
What kind of nonsense is this?? Are these conversion formulas correct or not?
Or is that twice as cold as -4... or -28.9... or...?
Brian
...but the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
-
- Rank
- Posts: 5424
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:26 pm
- Location: Hamilton Ontario
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
And sometimes, it's all in the way you look at things. It used to be, when I'd cross the border to shop (or, more accurately, when I'd be shopping while across the border), I'd see signage informing me what the exchange rate was on Canadian currency (I probably still do, but don't take notice any more). Let's say it was 10%. I'd go to the counter with my $10.00 widget and expect to pay $11.00 Canadian for it. At first, I was surprised that they would charge me $11.11. And, of course, the higher the 'exchange', the further from my calculations the end result was. If it was 20% (and I was expecting to pay $12.00), I'd be charged $12.50. Of course, at 50%, I'd have to pay $20.00.Paucle wrote:She was showing me a procedure that conflicted with the math. If she wanted me to give them 40% off, she needed to show me a different way to fill out the form.
Now I just use US currency when I'm over there.
Brian
...but the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
- Paucle
- Trekardy! Writer
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:36 pm
- Location: near Albany NY
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
You're calculating the cost of the item increasing by 10%, which would indeed be the $11, but you can't do that. The item does not increase in cost. It's 10 American. So you owe the merchant 10 American dollars. How much did you give him if you pay 11 Canadian?
Although the Merchant could eat the 11 cents for neighborly good will and just put two prices on everything- US and Can $ amounts.
Although the Merchant could eat the 11 cents for neighborly good will and just put two prices on everything- US and Can $ amounts.
-
- Rank
- Posts: 5424
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:26 pm
- Location: Hamilton Ontario
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
No. I was calculating the cost of a US dollar at a given exchange rate. The cost of the item is irrelevant. Also, as I said, it's 11 cents on a $10 item at 10%. A $100 item at 65% costs me almost $300 rather than the $165 that the exchange rate would imply.Paucle wrote:You're calculating the cost of the item increasing by 10%, which would indeed be the $11, but you can't do that. The item does not increase in cost. It's 10 American. So you owe the merchant 10 American dollars. How much did you give him if you pay 11 Canadian?
Although the Merchant could eat the 11 cents for neighborly good will and just put two prices on everything- US and Can $ amounts.
Brian
...but the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
- econgator
- Let's Go Mets!
- Posts: 10673
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:32 am
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
It's 82 out right now. I don't need to go anywhere.bpmod wrote:And when it's colder than that, all of the USians want to move up here.billy pilgrim wrote:Well maybe it was -40 ?bpmod wrote:Actually, the entire story is one made up by my friends and me with the thought "What if the US weather broadcasts got our temperatures 'right'?"
Brian
Brian
- Paucle
- Trekardy! Writer
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:36 pm
- Location: near Albany NY
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
checking back, you said the exchange rate is 10%. OK. Again, that doesn't mean you increase the American by 10%; rather you decrease the Canadian by 10%. Therein lies the difference. You have to offer enough Canadian $ so that the 10% reduction equals the American dollar. So if you owe me a dollar American, and give me 1.10 Canadian, how much have you offered me? (Since you're a nice guy, I'll eat the penny!)
-
- Rank
- Posts: 5424
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:26 pm
- Location: Hamilton Ontario
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
In case you didn't get what I meant (and for others that may not have, even if you did), if it were 82 (of your degrees) here, you* would look at our temperature of 27.8, and say "no thanks", even though it is the same. If your* temp was -62 (for instance) and ours was -52.2 (also the same), you* might get the impression it's warmer here.econgator wrote:It's 82 out right now. I don't need to go anywhere.bpmod wrote:And when it's colder than that, all of the USians want to move up here.
Brian
*'you' and 'your' here do not refer to you specifically, but to the aforementioned hypothetical USian who doesn't realize there's a different system in place.
Brian
...but the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
-
- Rank
- Posts: 5424
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:26 pm
- Location: Hamilton Ontario
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
But that's what I am saying. Looking at it one way, a 10% exchange equates to a 10% reduction. But that's not the way to calculate exchange. We (being so closely tied to the US economically and every other way) get our daily exchange rate news as two numbers. The first tells us what a US dollar will cost us. The second tells us what our dollar is worth in the US (both theoretically -- we never see those amounts in practice).Paucle wrote:checking back, you said the exchange rate is 10%. OK. Again, that doesn't mean you increase the American by 10%; rather you decrease the Canadian by 10%. Therein lies the difference. You have to offer enough Canadian $ so that the 10% reduction equals the American dollar. So if you owe me a dollar American, and give me 1.10 Canadian, how much have you offered me? (Since you're a nice guy, I'll eat the penny!)
Let's use a couple of actual dates in history to make the point (rounded off a little):
January 18, 2002 1.6403 0.6096
January 18, 2011 1.0075 0.9926
In the latter, we could say "less than 1%" and it's close enough either way. But in the former, we would generally say 64%. We also might say 60% (which would not be equivalent to the former's "less than 1%"; it would be equivalent to 99%), but we would never say 40% (which is what you* say).
* you being the aforementioned US merchants, and you specifically, if I am reading you right.
Brian
...but the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:11 am
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
I did say that I was talking about my preferences.bpmod wrote:No. At least in my case, it's because I went to school and I learned what was correct and incorrect. And if things have changed since I learned them, I don't have the opportunity (or the stamina) to keep up with the changes.Vanya wrote:The point is, you have no basis for objecting to different than or awhile or alot, other than (!) the fact that you don't like them.
Brian
Part of my objection, however, is my hope that changes take place not for random reasons, but somehow to improve the language. New usages do come into common acceptance to reflect new ways of thinking (e.g. after the Civil War, Americans started talking about "the United States IS" instead of "the United States ARE;" this reflected a new way of looking at the country. I can't fathom why someone started using "awhile." It improves nothing.
What do you think of the hypothetical example I used? If people started saying "I will be in town for aweek" (instead of 'for A WEEK') would you simply accept that as a new and correct usage? How about if they said "I will be in town for twoweeks" instead of "I will be in town for two weeks" (apart from the fact thay they are now overstaying their welcome)? If enough people start doing that, does it become correct? Where does that end?
In these usages the noun and tne modifier are separate words, or used to be. What is to be gained by jamming them together like this? Yes, I prefer changing the language only for good reason. If I'm teaching the class, you're darned right students get graded down for these substandard practices. And thanks, Brian, for sticking to some notion of right and wrong in language usage.
- Magna
- Hooked on Jeopardy
- Posts: 3079
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 2:37 pm
Re: Pet Intellectual Peeves
Fwiw, not everyone went to a school that agreed with your school's philosophy. Many went to schools where "different than" and "awhile" (where "while" is really just a noun) were taught as standard. So many of these disputes are really just a battle of what one person was taught vs. what another was taught. Also fwiw, "awhile" in the sense you don't like has been in use since the 1200s, when people were still speaking Middle English. Caxton used it in 1489. So it's not really a new usage - just a lingering old one that some people don't like.John Boy wrote:I did say that I was talking about my preferences.bpmod wrote:No. At least in my case, it's because I went to school and I learned what was correct and incorrect. And if things have changed since I learned them, I don't have the opportunity (or the stamina) to keep up with the changes.Vanya wrote:The point is, you have no basis for objecting to different than or awhile or alot, other than (!) the fact that you don't like them.
Brian
Part of my objection, however, is my hope that changes take place not for random reasons, but somehow to improve the language. New usages do come into common acceptance to reflect new ways of thinking (e.g. after the Civil War, Americans started talking about "the United States IS" instead of "the United States ARE;" this reflected a new way of looking at the country. I can't fathom why someone started using "awhile." It improves nothing.
I don't like "aweek," though I also can't see it catching on. Running the article and noun together like that would be confusing for everyone.