I have looked all over. I can't find this.opusthepenguin wrote:What's your source on that? My Google-fu has deserted me. Assuming it's correct, I withdraw my objection.cheezguyty wrote:"Haiti" was the U.S. government's official name for the island of Hispaniola until the 1930s.John Boy wrote:1. "Haiti" is not an island and the answer should have been counted wrong.
Monday, March 24, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall
- PeteMoss
- Loyal Jeopardista
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:11 pm
- Location: The bog
Re: Monday, March 24, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
- Magna
- Hooked on Jeopardy
- Posts: 3079
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 2:37 pm
Re: Monday, March 24, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Here: "The entire island has been referred to as Haiti...."PeteMoss wrote:I have looked all over. I can't find this.opusthepenguin wrote:What's your source on that? My Google-fu has deserted me. Assuming it's correct, I withdraw my objection.cheezguyty wrote:"Haiti" was the U.S. government's official name for the island of Hispaniola until the 1930s.John Boy wrote:1. "Haiti" is not an island and the answer should have been counted wrong.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/top ... Hispaniola
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 7:44 pm
Re: Monday, March 24, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
For what it's worth...
The 1903 edition of Webster's Unabridged defines "Haytian" as "Of, or pertaining to, the island of Hayti." (Yes, with a "y" in both.)
The 1916 edition of Webster's New International Dictionary (dictionary geeks familiar with "Webster's Second" and "Webster's Third" may think of this as "Webster's First") changes the spelling to "Haitian" and "Haiti." The Gazetteer section helpfully notes that "Hispaniola" is "a former name of Haiti island." Similarly, the gazetteer entry for "Dominican Republic" notes that it's "the E. part of Haiti isl."
The island is "Hispaniola" in my copy of Webster's Second, but I can't be sure just when the change was made. (While that edition was first printed in 1934, my copy is a later printing. The title/copyright page is mostly shredded, but it was certainly printed no earlier than 1950.)
I can take photos of the relevant pages if need be.
The 1903 edition of Webster's Unabridged defines "Haytian" as "Of, or pertaining to, the island of Hayti." (Yes, with a "y" in both.)
The 1916 edition of Webster's New International Dictionary (dictionary geeks familiar with "Webster's Second" and "Webster's Third" may think of this as "Webster's First") changes the spelling to "Haitian" and "Haiti." The Gazetteer section helpfully notes that "Hispaniola" is "a former name of Haiti island." Similarly, the gazetteer entry for "Dominican Republic" notes that it's "the E. part of Haiti isl."
The island is "Hispaniola" in my copy of Webster's Second, but I can't be sure just when the change was made. (While that edition was first printed in 1934, my copy is a later printing. The title/copyright page is mostly shredded, but it was certainly printed no earlier than 1950.)
I can take photos of the relevant pages if need be.
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:57 am
- Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Re: Monday, March 24, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
TryingHarder wrote:I got Curly. If anybody has ever seen a picture of Custer it is an apt nickname.
The bear is a symbol of Bern, Switzerland. If you have ever seen a toblerone, which is from Bern, it has a bear hidden in the Matterhorn.
Nailed Curly even without the dead giveaway of his birth name (Jerry Howard).
Don't know if mentioning "Jerry Howard" in the clue would have dumbed it down any.
- Mathew5000
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 624
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:46 am
Re: Monday, March 24, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
To decide between wagering 0 or 3599, I agree that it's too close for the difference to be meaningful. The takeaway message, however, is that either one of those wagers is significantly better than the all-in wager (which Joe actually made, and which was described upthread as defensible).chalupabatman786 wrote:I really like your thinking, but your conclusion is iffy at best. The difference between 0.2 and 0.18 is minuscule, and if you fiddled with your initial estimates even a tiny bit you would come to the opposite conclusion.Mathew5000 wrote: [...trimmed for space...]
I. Joe wagers 0. Wins if Nancy wagers ≥ 6800 and Derek wagers ≥ 5400 and they are both wrong:
0.85 * 0.8 * 0.3 = 0.2
II. Joe wagers 6400. Wins on a sole get if Nancy wagers ≥ 400. Also wins on a double get by Derek and Joe if Derek wagers ≤ 1000.
(0.1 * 0.98) + (0.07 * 0.1) = 0.1
III. Joe wagers 3599. Wins on a triple stumper if Nancy wagers ≥ 10400 and Derek wagers ≥ 8999. Also wins on a sole get if Nancy wagers ≥ 3201 and Derek wagers ≥ 1801.
(0.2 * 0.8 * 0.6) + (0.1 * 0.9 * 0.9) = 0.18
Based on my analysis, Joe should wager 0, giving him about a 20% chance of winning.
-
- Undefeated in Reruns
- Posts: 8937
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:31 am
Re: Monday, March 24, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Just as most people don't want to make the strategically sound wager from the lead that can get one passed from behind, many don't want to make a strategically sound wager from third place that guarantees a loss if second merely covers.
- Lefty
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 1823
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 4:49 pm
Re: Monday, March 24, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Just for the record, as I assume everybody agrees with me about the weakness of the FJ: Before giving away my copy of "Son of the Morning Star", I looked up "Curly" in the index, and it does appear, somewhat significantly, as the name of the Crow scout who was arguably the only survivor from Custer's side (looking at Little Bighorn as a campaign rather than just the battle, as fighting was not part of the scout's job description), aside from Keogh's horse Comanche.
I'm smart and I want respect.
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 6030
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:55 pm
Re: Monday, March 24, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
This was mentioned earlier in the thread-Lefty wrote:Just for the record, as I assume everybody agrees with me about the weakness of the FJ: Before giving away my copy of "Son of the Morning Star", I looked up "Curly" in the index, and it does appear, somewhat significantly, as the name of the Crow scout who was arguably the only survivor from Custer's side (looking at Little Bighorn as a campaign rather than just the battle, as fighting was not part of the scout's job description), aside from Keogh's horse Comanche.
http://www.jboard.tv/viewtopic.php?f=1& ... ar#p106662
- Lefty
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 1823
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 4:49 pm
Re: Monday, March 24, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Ah, i see. Sorry about that. And sorry for bumping this thread yet again. I'm not sure which I'm more sorry about.davey wrote:This was mentioned earlier in the thread-Lefty wrote:Just for the record, as I assume everybody agrees with me about the weakness of the FJ: Before giving away my copy of "Son of the Morning Star", I looked up "Curly" in the index, and it does appear, somewhat significantly, as the name of the Crow scout who was arguably the only survivor from Custer's side (looking at Little Bighorn as a campaign rather than just the battle, as fighting was not part of the scout's job description), aside from Keogh's horse Comanche.
http://www.jboard.tv/viewtopic.php?f=1& ... ar#p106662
I'm smart and I want respect.