Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

This is where all of the games are discussed.

Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall

User avatar
Robert K S
Jeopardy! Champion
Posts: 1862
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:26 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Contact:

Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by Robert K S »

For well over a century the National Geographic Society has served humanity as a nonprofit organization "for the increase and diffusion of geographical knowledge." The principal vehicle for its educational mission was its publication of National Geographic magazine, the cable channel of the same name, and its associated media properties. Many years ago Jeopardy! began a fruitful partnership with Lindblad Expeditions and National Geographic, which has enabled the show to travel to exotic locations for taping of its Clue Crew clues and provided the show with themed content. Now, the recent sale of control of the National Geographic media properties to Rupert Murdoch's 21st Century Fox sounds the death knell to the not-for-profit motivations of service to education and exploration.

Jeopardy! is a game show and its principal motive is the profit of its owners. National Geographic's media properties will probably continue to provide content of some semblance of quality and educational value, at least superficially. From that perspective there is nothing inconsistent with the missions of the partners and the continuation of the partnership.

I question, however, whether, along with the shift in the National Geographic properties' control and mission, will not also come a loss of credibility and a partisan political taint to the National Geographic brand. It's easy to joke about this sort of thing; dozens of Facebook memes have already made light of it, while illuminating the travesty of the sale more concisely than I do here. It's also easy to ridicule a suggestion, like so many "I'll-never-watch-the-show-again-since-they-had-a-political-figure-read-clues" posts, that Jeopardy! should do one thing or another to avoid appearing partisan itself. But undoubtedly a reason for the partnership was the neutrality and credibility that the National Geographic name lent to anything it was associated with. This reason is now largely gone. In short order, a partnership with National Geographic will make as much sense for Jeopardy! as a partnership with Fox News. I have to wonder if this reality-grounded perception should not alter the calculus by which Jeopardy! will evaluate the sensibility of the continuation of the partnership.

User avatar
OrangeSAM
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 2086
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 9:00 pm

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by OrangeSAM »

I'm asking myself similar questions as an NGS member. I don't have any answers yet.
OCSam

User avatar
Volante
Harbinger of the Doomed Lemur
Posts: 7089
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by Volante »

Fox also ran the Cosmos reboot. I'd wait and see how much NatGeo changes. (Or until I win one of those Lindblad trips.)

Vanya
The support is non-zero
Posts: 2727
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by Vanya »

Volante wrote:Fox also ran the Cosmos reboot. I'd wait and see how much NatGeo changes. (Or until I win one of those Lindblad trips.)
Why pass up a chance to bash Murdoch and Fox News?

User avatar
MitchO
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 902
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2014 10:19 am

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by MitchO »

Because bashing an entity with a general "Boo! Hiss!" is still not even the tiniest of fractions as the same as wishing physical harm or death upon the other side of the aisle, and this doesn't do anything to prove a point?

Johnblue
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:55 am

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by Johnblue »

All this pearl clutching! I'll stick with Nat Geo & I actually just signed up to take a trip to Antarctica with them & Lindblad. I don't recall a bunch of conservatives whining about Jeopardy's association with the NY Times but maybe there's more maturity on one side.

seaborgium
Undefeated in Reruns
Posts: 6814
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by seaborgium »

Johnblue wrote:I don't recall a bunch of conservatives whining about Jeopardy's association with the NY Times but maybe there's more maturity on one side.
I guess you don't look at the J! Facebook page.

sarisson
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 833
Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 8:39 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by sarisson »

Is this satire?
How would National Geographic get political? Is Koch Industries going to put 40 full-page ads in every issue? Will there be a miniseries on NatGeo on young-earth creationism, or the abiogenic origin of oil? Will Jeopardy have to air on Fox now?
A few major conglomerates control virtually all the media in the US (and Australia, now that everyone's favorite antipodean billionaire has acquired yet another company). Whether they're "liberal" or "conservative" conglomerates is irrelevant.
Hoping for a third lap

User avatar
Robert K S
Jeopardy! Champion
Posts: 1862
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:26 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Contact:

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by Robert K S »

sarisson wrote:A few major conglomerates control virtually all the media in the US (and Australia, now that everyone's favorite antipodean billionaire has acquired yet another company). Whether they're "liberal" or "conservative" conglomerates is irrelevant.
I think you've hit the nail on the head. Mr. Murdoch didn't acquire "another company". National Geographic wasn't a for-profit corporation.
sarisson wrote:How would National Geographic get political?
The worry is less that the properties will become overtly political--although that could happen in much worse ways than the ones you list--and more that the change in master means necessarily--legally necessarily--a change in behavior, a change in character. Prior to this sale, the National Geographic properties answered to a board of trustees who were obliged to act with the (nonpartisan) mission in mind. Now they are obliged to do whatever Mr. Murdoch commands them to do. You've probably heard that the transformation began this week with the cutting of costs (including mass layoffs) in such nuisance areas as fact-checking and photojournalism. These things tend to be important for an organization respected and admired for education, exploration, and exposing environmental evils such as poaching and deforestation--the sorts of things that used to be the very fabric of the organization. Now, I would guess the focus is likely to be more on entertainment. Anyone with imagination could compile lists of worrisome directions the media entities could take. An obvious direction for the TV channel to take would be to go from the more bona fide educational and documentary material to more reality TV and animal porn. We know that this is the direction a channel in this genre will naturally take under a profit motive because it's what happened to Animal Planet.

Vanya
The support is non-zero
Posts: 2727
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by Vanya »

sarisson wrote:Is this satire?
How would National Geographic get political? Is Koch Industries going to put 40 full-page ads in every issue? Will there be a miniseries on NatGeo on young-earth creationism, or the abiogenic origin of oil? Will Jeopardy have to air on Fox now?
A few major conglomerates control virtually all the media in the US (and Australia, now that everyone's favorite antipodean billionaire has acquired yet another company). Whether they're "liberal" or "conservative" conglomerates is irrelevant.

Well, we all know National Geographic is smut, all those half-dressed natives; disgusting.

User avatar
triviawayne
Hoping I don’t drown in this contestant pool
Posts: 1809
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:50 pm

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by triviawayne »

Vanya wrote:
sarisson wrote:Is this satire?
How would National Geographic get political? Is Koch Industries going to put 40 full-page ads in every issue? Will there be a miniseries on NatGeo on young-earth creationism, or the abiogenic origin of oil? Will Jeopardy have to air on Fox now?
A few major conglomerates control virtually all the media in the US (and Australia, now that everyone's favorite antipodean billionaire has acquired yet another company). Whether they're "liberal" or "conservative" conglomerates is irrelevant.

Well, we all know National Geographic is smut, all those half-dressed natives; disgusting.
Pessimist! I think they're half undressed.
Total game show career losings = $171,522

User avatar
dhkendall
Pursuing the Dream
Posts: 8776
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:49 am
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Contact:

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by dhkendall »

Vanya wrote:
sarisson wrote:Is this satire?
How would National Geographic get political? Is Koch Industries going to put 40 full-page ads in every issue? Will there be a miniseries on NatGeo on young-earth creationism, or the abiogenic origin of oil? Will Jeopardy have to air on Fox now?
A few major conglomerates control virtually all the media in the US (and Australia, now that everyone's favorite antipodean billionaire has acquired yet another company). Whether they're "liberal" or "conservative" conglomerates is irrelevant.

Well, we all know National Geographic is smut, all those half-dressed natives; disgusting.
Hey, like pretty much any teenage boy I was looking at National Geographics in my room under the covers with a flashlight. Good times.
Spoiler
OK, so I was looking at the maps.
"Jeopardy! is two parts luck and one part luck" - Me

"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings

Follow my progress game by game since 2012

User avatar
This Is Kirk!
Jeopardy! Champion
Posts: 4952
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:35 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by This Is Kirk! »

sarisson wrote:Is this satire?
How would National Geographic get political? Is Koch Industries going to put 40 full-page ads in every issue? Will there be a miniseries on NatGeo on young-earth creationism, or the abiogenic origin of oil?
It's not necessarily the stories they will publish but possibly stories they may decide not to publish now.

But, no, I don't think Jeopardy! should end their partnership with National Geographic.

User avatar
JonathanHenke
Loyal Jeopardista
Posts: 129
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 9:55 pm
Location: St. Peter, MN

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by JonathanHenke »

Jeopardy has has so much blatant product-placement lately that I wonder if *this* is the ethical hill to die on. I mean, however far NG falls from its previous quality, Jeopardy is likely already shilling for even shadier organizations.
Washed-up one-time Jeopardy! contestant
January 11, 2005

User avatar
Volante
Harbinger of the Doomed Lemur
Posts: 7089
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by Volante »

JonathanHenke wrote:Jeopardy has has so much blatant product-placement lately that I wonder if *this* is the ethical hill to die on. I mean, however far NG falls from its previous quality, Jeopardy is likely already shilling for even shadier organizations.
Like Sony Pictures!

BRD-98
Loyal Jeopardista
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:33 am
Location: Atlanta

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by BRD-98 »

Why is this even an issue?

Image

User avatar
This Is Kirk!
Jeopardy! Champion
Posts: 4952
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:35 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by This Is Kirk! »

^Interesting spelling of the word "literally."

User avatar
dhkendall
Pursuing the Dream
Posts: 8776
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:49 am
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Contact:

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by dhkendall »

This Is Kirk! wrote:^Interesting spelling of the word "literally."
He meant "littorally", he was talking about the coast.
"Jeopardy! is two parts luck and one part luck" - Me

"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings

Follow my progress game by game since 2012

User avatar
jkbrat
Jeopardy! Champion
Posts: 1000
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:30 pm

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by jkbrat »

dhkendall wrote:
This Is Kirk! wrote:^Interesting spelling of the word "literally."
He meant "littorally", he was talking about the coast.
"I just threw some trash on the ground," said Tom litterally.
There are times I almost think I am not sure of what I absolutely knooooooooo-OW

Learn, Review, Repeat

A Archipelago

User avatar
BigDaddyMatty
Save Me, Maggie!
Posts: 2983
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:05 am
Location: Wherever I May Roam
Contact:

Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?

Post by BigDaddyMatty »

jkbrat wrote:
dhkendall wrote:
This Is Kirk! wrote:^Interesting spelling of the word "literally."
He meant "littorally", he was talking about the coast.
"I just threw some trash on the ground," said Tom litterally.
Swift response.
Sprinkles are for winners.

Locked