Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

This is where all of the games are discussed.

Moderators: alietr, econgator, dhkendall, trainman

User avatar
mfc248
Loyal Jeopardista
Posts: 231
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2015 8:08 pm
Location: Royersford, PA
Contact:

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by mfc248 » Sat Nov 19, 2016 1:49 am

IronNeck wrote:
MarkBarrett wrote:
Michael: You are 2-0 playing from the champ's podium. With the high score of the semis that gets you back at position 1 for the finals, right? Well done in your two games that aired this week.
I'm actually curious; how do they determine this? And for that matter, how do they determine which quarterfinalist winner and wildcard plays in which semifinal?
Podium position in the semifinals and the two-day, total-point affair is determined by final score in the previous round. (In the quarterfinals, it depends on the tournament being contested.*)

How they draw the QF winners and the wild cards into the semifinals remains generally a mystery to us, beyond the fact that players who met in a QF will not rematch in an SF.

* ToC QF positions are based on previous winnings; in Teen, College, and Teachers, it's alphabetical order, left to right on your television screen.

seaborgium
Undefeated in Reruns
Posts: 4447
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by seaborgium » Sat Nov 19, 2016 4:00 am

IronNeck wrote:
MarkBarrett wrote:
Michael: You are 2-0 playing from the champ's podium. With the high score of the semis that gets you back at position 1 for the finals, right? Well done in your two games that aired this week.
I'm actually curious; how do they determine this? And for that matter, how do they determine which quarterfinalist winner and wildcard plays in which semifinal?
Finalists are ordered by their scores in the semis.

The Powers That Be put together the semifinal matchups (and the QFs', for that matter) based on what combinations they think will produce the most interesting games. How they determine this is unknown.

User avatar
harrumph
Voyeur
Posts: 1386
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 12:00 pm
Location: Princeton, NJ

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by harrumph » Sat Nov 19, 2016 6:02 am

Congrats to Michael and may the retroluck be with him.

User avatar
bpmod
Rank
Posts: 5427
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:26 pm
Location: Hamilton Ontario

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by bpmod » Sat Nov 19, 2016 8:33 am

They should decide the airdates before taping, so we don't see Alex mouth "tomorrow" while hearing the voiceover "Monday" (among other errors & edits throughout the tourney).
SpoilerShow
And I wonder how many folks at home were shaking their heads the other day, with Alex saying "The baseball season is now underway", just days after the historic end to a 108-year drought.

And there was something else about presidential elections IIRC.
Brian
...but the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.

If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.

User avatar
goatman
Man Who Stares At Goats!
Posts: 1324
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:43 pm
Location: Calvert, Maryland

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by goatman » Sat Nov 19, 2016 8:48 am

Instaget somehow idk it just popped for me. IMHO some of the clues for the teens are tougher than regular games! Kudos to the youngsters for super game play!! 8-)
The corridors of my mind are plastered with 3M Post-It notes!

User avatar
BigDaddyMatty
Save Me, Maggie!
Posts: 2241
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:05 am
Location: Rowlett, Texas

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by BigDaddyMatty » Sat Nov 19, 2016 11:46 am

Coryat: $34,200
46 R/3 W
DD: 3/3
FJ: :(
LT: peanut brittle, X-rays

Great game, Michael. Absolutely dominant. Good retroluck in the final. I am so glad I didn't get into the teen tournament when I was in school. These kids would've kicked my butt.

On FJ! I kept trying to get away from "maelstrom" and come up with the geometric term for a meeting point, but it just wasn't happening.
TenPoundHammer wrote:Why didn't just "brittle" get a BMS?
Because it didn't fit the category (e.g., "peanut").
Sprinkles are for winners.

sarisson
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 575
Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 8:39 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by sarisson » Sat Nov 19, 2016 12:23 pm

BigDaddyMatty wrote: On FJ! I kept trying to get away from "maelstrom" and come up with the geometric term for a meeting point, but it just wasn't happening.
Same here. Sometimes the clues that look like they're in your wheelhouse end up being in the outhouse. Total head-slapper when I saw the correct response. It doesn't help that "vertex" has more than one mathematical meaning (e.g., the maximum or minimum of a parabola). There goes my perfect week.
One-time swimmer

User avatar
TenPoundHammer
Not J! Contestant Material
Posts: 5481
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 2:59 pm
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by TenPoundHammer » Sat Nov 19, 2016 1:10 pm

BigDaddyMatty wrote:
TenPoundHammer wrote:Why didn't just "brittle" get a BMS?
Because it didn't fit the category (e.g., "peanut").
Still, there's only one thing that "brittle" could possibly mean in that context, and that's peanut brittle. She should've at least gotten a pause to add "peanut" instead of insta-neg.
Ten Pound Hammer

This space for rent

User avatar
bpmod
Rank
Posts: 5427
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:26 pm
Location: Hamilton Ontario

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by bpmod » Sat Nov 19, 2016 1:31 pm

TenPoundHammer wrote:
BigDaddyMatty wrote:
TenPoundHammer wrote:Why didn't just "brittle" get a BMS?
Because it didn't fit the category (e.g., "peanut").
Still, there's only one thing that "brittle" could possibly mean in that context, and that's peanut brittle. She should've at least gotten a pause to add "peanut" instead of insta-neg.
If I recall correctly, there was a pause, and more than just a small one. It seemed to me that Alex was trying to prompt her non-verbally. Her lights were clearly counting down until they went out, and only then did Alex neg her.

Brian
...but the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.

If I had 50 cents for every math question I got right, I'd have $6.30 by now.

seaborgium
Undefeated in Reruns
Posts: 4447
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by seaborgium » Sat Nov 19, 2016 3:40 pm

TenPoundHammer wrote:
BigDaddyMatty wrote:
TenPoundHammer wrote:Why didn't just "brittle" get a BMS?
Because it didn't fit the category (e.g., "peanut").
Still, there's only one thing that "brittle" could possibly mean in that context, and that's peanut brittle. She should've at least gotten a pause to add "peanut" instead of insta-neg.
There's only one Turgenev (THE "I.T." GUY, $2,000), and only one outlaw named Nelson (I WANT MY "BABY" BACK, "BABY" BACK, $1,000); however unambiguous a response is, if it doesn't fit a criterion specifically given by the category, it's wrong and deserves an insta-neg just as much as a correct response not given as a question.

User avatar
This Is Kirk!
Jeopardy! Champion
Posts: 3218
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:35 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by This Is Kirk! » Sat Nov 19, 2016 4:29 pm

seaborgium wrote:The Powers That Be put together the semifinal matchups (and the QFs', for that matter) based on what combinations they think will produce the most interesting games.
I'm surprised S&P would allow that. I would have thought it would need to be random to avoid any possibility of potential favoritism.

geolawyerman
Loyal Jeopardista
Posts: 231
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 8:26 pm

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by geolawyerman » Sat Nov 19, 2016 9:59 pm

This Is Kirk! wrote:
seaborgium wrote:The Powers That Be put together the semifinal matchups (and the QFs', for that matter) based on what combinations they think will produce the most interesting games.
I'm surprised S&P would allow that. I would have thought it would need to be random to avoid any possibility of potential favoritism.
There may also have been geographic (Lucia and Alec in separate games) and gender (at least one girl in every game) considerations. I also knew Lucia, so they may have wanted to keep us separate as well.
2016 Teen Tournament contestant

IronNeck
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 1006
Joined: Fri May 13, 2016 12:26 am

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by IronNeck » Sun Nov 20, 2016 1:44 am

geolawyerman wrote:
This Is Kirk! wrote:
seaborgium wrote:The Powers That Be put together the semifinal matchups (and the QFs', for that matter) based on what combinations they think will produce the most interesting games.
I'm surprised S&P would allow that. I would have thought it would need to be random to avoid any possibility of potential favoritism.
There may also have been geographic (Lucia and Alec in separate games) and gender (at least one girl in every game) considerations. I also knew Lucia, so they may have wanted to keep us separate as well.
Did they ask you about that before the tapings? "Hey, have you known any of these other contestants personally beforehand?"

User avatar
alietr
Site Admin
Posts: 4988
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:20 pm
Location: Bethesda, MD

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by alietr » Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:28 am

Congratulations, Michael! Well done, sir!

I kept trying at it in two directions -- node and eddy (figuring something like whirlpool was too long). Nothing seemed to work. Neither vortex nor vertex occurred to me.

User avatar
Cat Hammarskjold
Feline Secretary-General
Posts: 546
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:35 am

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by Cat Hammarskjold » Sun Nov 20, 2016 12:38 pm

econgator wrote:Is there some reason I should have known to go with FedEx on that Business clue?
Because it's not H&R Block?
I identify as a Jeopardy! fan, and use who/what pronouns.

User avatar
dhkendall
Pursuing the Dream
Posts: 8082
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:49 am
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Contact:

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by dhkendall » Sun Nov 20, 2016 3:51 pm

IronNeck wrote:
geolawyerman wrote:
This Is Kirk! wrote:
seaborgium wrote:The Powers That Be put together the semifinal matchups (and the QFs', for that matter) based on what combinations they think will produce the most interesting games.
I'm surprised S&P would allow that. I would have thought it would need to be random to avoid any possibility of potential favoritism.
There may also have been geographic (Lucia and Alec in separate games) and gender (at least one girl in every game) considerations. I also knew Lucia, so they may have wanted to keep us separate as well.
Did they ask you about that before the tapings? "Hey, have you known any of these other contestants personally beforehand?"
That might fall under The Paperwork, I know when I filled mine out, it asked "Do you know, or have you communicated with anyone who has appeared as a contestant on Jeopardy!?" (I knew there was a reason I kept my copy of The Paperwork!) Although, yeah, that kinda only covers those that already appeared. (To be safe, when I filled mine out (which had 76 names on 6 pages (also detailing extent of communication with said person - the joys of being a boardie) I also added in some people who I've communicated with a lot who I know were in the pool (or were auditioning the same day or next day as me) as a precaution.)
"Jeopardy! is two parts luck and one part luck" - Me

"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings

User avatar
dhkendall
Pursuing the Dream
Posts: 8082
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:49 am
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Contact:

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by dhkendall » Sun Nov 20, 2016 3:57 pm

IronNeck wrote:Edit- Also like Michael's continued DD hunting.
This is why having boardies on the show makes for great TV like that.
"Jeopardy! is two parts luck and one part luck" - Me

"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings

User avatar
Woof
Swimming in the Jeopardy! Pool
Posts: 3068
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:53 pm

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by Woof » Mon Nov 21, 2016 10:35 am

Michael, you looked hell of impressive to me in your semifinal: poised, confident and with good strategic savvy. It also doesn't hurt that you're good on the buzzer and know a few things, too! :mrgreen: I really enjoyed watching this game and I felt that it was one of the best played games of the tournament. I'm looking forward to the finals. I kept trying to think of who you reminded me of and I think that I've got it: a young Cris Collinsworth (much less annoying to listen to, though) :mrgreen:

User avatar
Woppy T
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:59 am

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by Woppy T » Mon Nov 21, 2016 12:48 pm

Bamaman wrote:Sounds like they would have to take UPS. But the girl who got the clue is from Memphis so that is probably why she went with them.
Except that the clue was going for the company that says things about its service. If UPS never made these exact claims, particularly the 99% of world GDP thing, then FedEx would be the only answer. But I agree that it's still a bad clue.

geolawyerman
Loyal Jeopardista
Posts: 231
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 8:26 pm

Re: Friday, November 18, 2016 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by geolawyerman » Mon Nov 21, 2016 4:21 pm

Woof wrote:Michael, you looked hell of impressive to me in your semifinal: poised, confident and with good strategic savvy. It also doesn't hurt that you're good on the buzzer and know a few things, too! :mrgreen: I really enjoyed watching this game and I felt that it was one of the best played games of the tournament. I'm looking forward to the finals. I kept trying to think of who you reminded me of and I think that I've got it: a young Cris Collinsworth (much less annoying to listen to, though) :mrgreen:
Thanks for the kind words! And thanks to everyone else who made similar compliments.
2016 Teen Tournament contestant

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], jjwaymee, Spaceman Spiff, teapot37, This Is Kirk!, Troydozzy, wapedDep and 14 guests