Since it's elimination of something, they could have simply cut it and ran longer credits (I'm sure any comments would be pretty short) or added some tidbit to an interview to get back to the scheduled run time. Probably all done in the edit bay.Linear Gnome wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 7:35 pm For the record: the College Championship had originally been scheduled to air beginning February 5, so Alex must have had to redo his closing remarks to remove any reference to Jenny waiting two weeks before defending her title.
Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 689
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:13 am
Re: Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
--Peter
-
- Jeopardy! UTOCer
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:06 pm
Re: Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
First of all, I think they have to have Ryan back.
There are two different schisms that are referred to sometimes as great schisms. 1054, with the mutual excommunications (partly justified by Filioque) and the schism of the 14th century which was a schism based on two claimants to the papacy
The clue was the rift between Latin and Greek churches
Great Schism is right
He comes back
There are two different schisms that are referred to sometimes as great schisms. 1054, with the mutual excommunications (partly justified by Filioque) and the schism of the 14th century which was a schism based on two claimants to the papacy
The clue was the rift between Latin and Greek churches
Great Schism is right
He comes back
Last edited by JyV92 on Tue Feb 06, 2018 7:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- twelvefootboy
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 2702
- Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2016 11:18 pm
- Location: Tornado Alley / Southwest Missouri
Re: Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
I've got to defend Oklahoma, my southern neighbor. It's gotten a lot better now since that family moved from Oklahoma to Texas and raised the IQ in both states
Disclaimer - repeated exposure to author's musings may cause befuddlement.
- opusthepenguin
- The Best Darn Penguin on the Whole JBoard
- Posts: 10319
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:33 pm
- Location: Shawnee, KS
- Contact:
Re: Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
I agree. With the extra $2400 from a proper ruling, Ryan would have had enough to win the game on his sole get. At least potentially. It's always possible he would've gone extra-wimpy on his second DD bet and still been locked out. But a) I doubt it, and b) that shouldn't be a consideration when deciding to bring someone back. With the correct ruling, Ryan had a path to victory. Without it, he didn't. Bring Ryan back!JyV92 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:40 pm First of all, I think they have to have Ryan back.
There are two different schisms that I referred to some times as great schisms. 1054, with the mutual excommunications (partly justified by Filioque) and the schism of the 14th century which was a schism based on two claimants to the papacy
The clue was the rift between Latin and Greek churches
Great Schism is right
He comes back
- pinkfreud
- Jeopardy! Contestant
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 6:28 pm
- Location: Tulsa, OK
Re: Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
-
- Loyal Jeopardista
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 10:30 am
Re: Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
Definitely agree that Great Schism should have been accepted. Can a player challenge a ruling months after the taping, or is discretion left solely to the producers?
-
- Undefeated in Reruns
- Posts: 8941
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:31 am
Re: Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
It sounds like TPTB reconsidered their ruling on "Great Schism"; someone posted last week on the J! Facebook page saying they attended a taping in which Ryan was back. It'll air in July.
- Volante
- Harbinger of the Doomed Lemur
- Posts: 9254
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
The eternal question...do I recalculate my score or no?...seaborgium wrote: ↑Mon Apr 09, 2018 10:39 pm It sounds like TPTB reconsidered their ruling on "Great Schism"; someone posted last week on the J! Facebook page saying they attended a taping in which Ryan was back. It'll air in July.
The best thing that Neil Armstrong ever did, was to let us all imagine we were him.
Latest movies (1-10): Everything Everywhere All at Once (10), Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken (6), Black Sunday /1960/ (6), Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (7)
Latest movies (1-10): Everything Everywhere All at Once (10), Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken (6), Black Sunday /1960/ (6), Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (7)
-
- Also Receiving Votes
- Posts: 12898
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 1:39 pm
Re: Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
If he gets credit for Great Schism to begin with and then goes all in on the last DD, he has $8,400 going into FJ. Still in third place, but much closer. Who knows what he would have bet. No guarantee he would have won.
Getting wrongly negged may turn out to have worked in his favor.
Getting wrongly negged may turn out to have worked in his favor.
- opusthepenguin
- The Best Darn Penguin on the Whole JBoard
- Posts: 10319
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:33 pm
- Location: Shawnee, KS
- Contact:
Re: Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
Sweet! I like to think they read our comments.seaborgium wrote: ↑Mon Apr 09, 2018 10:39 pm It sounds like TPTB reconsidered their ruling on "Great Schism"; someone posted last week on the J! Facebook page saying they attended a taping in which Ryan was back. It'll air in July.
- opusthepenguin
- The Best Darn Penguin on the Whole JBoard
- Posts: 10319
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:33 pm
- Location: Shawnee, KS
- Contact:
Re: Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
Definitely possible. But he did bet the full $2000 on that final DD, even though he only had $1400. That suggests some situational awareness. He knows he needs to go big or he's going home. That suggests he'd have made the proper FJ wager to win on a sole solve. And other things being equal, with credit for "schism," he only needed to wager $151 on that final DD to be in contention going into FJ. (Unless I screwed up the math again.)Bamaman wrote: ↑Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:36 am If he gets credit for Great Schism to begin with and then goes all in on the last DD, he has $8,400 going into FJ. Still in third place, but much closer. Who knows what he would have bet. No guarantee he would have won.
Getting wrongly negged may turn out to have worked in his favor.
-
- Also Receiving Votes
- Posts: 12898
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 1:39 pm
Re: Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
But if he is at $8,400 going into FJ, he has both of the others’ MSBIW beat, so he might bet zero.
But I don’t have a problem with him coming back as the leader might have bet differently with two players to worry about.
But I don’t have a problem with him coming back as the leader might have bet differently with two players to worry about.
- Linear Gnome
- One Miner Gal
- Posts: 2007
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:55 am
- Location: Missouri
Re: Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
Bumping this thread since I'm apparently not the only one who was hibernating when seaborgium posted this tidbit.seaborgium wrote: ↑Mon Apr 09, 2018 10:39 pm It sounds like TPTB reconsidered their ruling on "Great Schism"; someone posted last week on the J! Facebook page saying they attended a taping in which Ryan was back. It'll air in July.
- mfc248
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2015 8:08 pm
- Location: Royersford, PA
- Contact:
Re: Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
Ryan is slated to appear again this Tuesday (July 17).
- AndyTheQuizzer
- Lots and Lots of Interviews
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:01 am
- Location: St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
For the record, I remember this post, and I definitely seem to recall that audience member not actually mentioning Ryan by name in the post.seaborgium wrote: ↑Mon Apr 09, 2018 10:39 pm It sounds like TPTB reconsidered their ruling on "Great Schism"; someone posted last week on the J! Facebook page saying they attended a taping in which Ryan was back. It'll air in July.
In fact, I spent the better part of three months thinking it was Lane Flynn coming back over the Apple founder brouhaha.
-
- Undefeated in Reruns
- Posts: 8941
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:31 am
Re: Friday, February 2, 2018 Game Recap and Discussion [SPOILERS]
Eventually they (we?) wrung it out of the poster (and then once he named names, he said too much and I had to advise him to delete comments and he obliged). For what it's worth, though, I have encouraged Lane to stay in contact with TPTB over that issue, using the Leslie Burns-Dell'Acqua example of having a protest initially blown off by TPTB then accepted.OntarioQuizzer wrote: ↑Mon Jul 16, 2018 10:27 amFor the record, I remember this post, and I definitely seem to recall that audience member not actually mentioning Ryan by name in the post.seaborgium wrote: ↑Mon Apr 09, 2018 10:39 pm It sounds like TPTB reconsidered their ruling on "Great Schism"; someone posted last week on the J! Facebook page saying they attended a taping in which Ryan was back. It'll air in July.
In fact, I spent the better part of three months thinking it was Lane Flynn coming back over the Apple founder brouhaha.