LL79: For the LLamas

This is where all of the games are discussed.

Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall

Post Reply
User avatar
RJRouge
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2018 4:39 pm

Re: LL79: For the LLamas

Post by RJRouge »

This Is Kirk! wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 12:29 am
sarisson wrote: Tue Feb 12, 2019 6:06 pm I went 8/12 on Thermo but finished slightly ahead of former Harvard physics instructor (among other things) PahkJ. I haven't used thermo much since grad school.
I had one of my highest-ever 1DS finishes in "Bird Nerds OR ELSE," which was a lot of fun.
Top ten finish for me in that one for me!

I have a masters in mechanical engineering, so probably should have done better than 71% on thermo, but it's definitely been a long time since I've used it. I did miss out on some points by putting -273 and -460 for the absolute zero question.
I didn't do very well, but I find fault with the -459 answer for Fahrenheit. I suppose, however, that it would come down to an argument over the difference between truncating and rounding (rounding, the answer is definitely -460).
User avatar
Woof
Swimming in the Jeopardy! Pool
Posts: 5130
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:53 pm

Re: LL79: For the LLamas

Post by Woof »

RJRouge wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 1:39 am
This Is Kirk! wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 12:29 am
sarisson wrote: Tue Feb 12, 2019 6:06 pm I went 8/12 on Thermo but finished slightly ahead of former Harvard physics instructor (among other things) PahkJ. I haven't used thermo much since grad school.
I had one of my highest-ever 1DS finishes in "Bird Nerds OR ELSE," which was a lot of fun.
Top ten finish for me in that one for me!

I have a masters in mechanical engineering, so probably should have done better than 71% on thermo, but it's definitely been a long time since I've used it. I did miss out on some points by putting -273 and -460 for the absolute zero question.
I didn't do very well, but I find fault with the -459 answer for Fahrenheit. I suppose, however, that it would come down to an argument over the difference between truncating and rounding (rounding, the answer is definitely -460).
??? My mental math got me from -273 to -459.4, which latterly both truncated and rounds to -459. Am I overlooking something?
User avatar
boson
Trivial
Posts: 1719
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:01 pm

Re: LL79: For the LLamas

Post by boson »

Absolute zero is - 273.15 C. If you convert the truncated number you get something different than the exact number.
User avatar
RJRouge
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2018 4:39 pm

Re: LL79: For the LLamas

Post by RJRouge »

Woof wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 7:32 am
RJRouge wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 1:39 am I didn't do very well, but I find fault with the -459 answer for Fahrenheit. I suppose, however, that it would come down to an argument over the difference between truncating and rounding (rounding, the answer is definitely -460).
??? My mental math got me from -273 to -459.4, which latterly both truncated and rounds to -459. Am I overlooking something?
-459.67 F is the value to 2 decimal places.
User avatar
Woof
Swimming in the Jeopardy! Pool
Posts: 5130
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:53 pm

Re: LL79: For the LLamas

Post by Woof »

boson wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 7:34 am Absolute zero is - 273.15 C. If you convert the truncated number you get something different than the exact number.
Ah, so. I never work with the sig figs, hence my confusion.
Post Reply