Of course ... show-off.bpmod wrote:Oh, and for FJ, I said Henry Deutschendorf Jr.
Judges?
Brian

Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall
Of course ... show-off.bpmod wrote:Oh, and for FJ, I said Henry Deutschendorf Jr.
Judges?
Brian
ACW wrote:Ghastly J, better FJ, nice job Brooks.
What happens if the game ended in a tie? 4-person finals?
Not quite categoryless, check out the games linked to the Archive entry for "Tiebreaker Round" (in bpmod's response), they have categories attached to them.MDCSWildcats86 wrote:ACW wrote:Ghastly J, better FJ, nice job Brooks.
What happens if the game ended in a tie? 4-person finals?
They play a 1-question, categoryless tiebreaker playoff.
This is what you get when you offload a bunch of unused clues from disparate categories into the catch-all "Potpourri", you're deprived of the original category name and contextual clues. (At least, this is what I've long suspected "Potpourri" was made of)alietr wrote:Yeah, I hate to say it, but Potpourri seemed symptomatic of the writing being off again. A fair number of mis-valued clues, clues where you had no idea what they were looking for ... blecch.
I don't see anything at wiki or the official site that would support "mosque" being correct.dhkendall wrote:Judges: For the J! round DD: I said "the Alhambra Mosque". (Granted, the fact that I got "Alhambra" at all was a total ex-recto) - my trip to my friendly neighbourhood Wikipedia shows me that Alhambra isn't a mosque (at least from a 5 second glance at the article), so I'm probably wrong, but I'd like more solid confirmation.
So in other words I should have shut my mouth after "Alhambra", but before "mosque".econgator wrote:I don't see anything at wiki or the official site that would support "mosque" being correct.dhkendall wrote:Judges: For the J! round DD: I said "the Alhambra Mosque". (Granted, the fact that I got "Alhambra" at all was a total ex-recto) - my trip to my friendly neighbourhood Wikipedia shows me that Alhambra isn't a mosque (at least from a 5 second glance at the article), so I'm probably wrong, but I'd like more solid confirmation.
Yes. Cocina.TenPoundHammer wrote:Should I know that cuisine is French for kitchen?
Then pick the other choice next time.TenPoundHammer wrote:I took a 50/50 on Lincoln vs. Holland, and like EVERY FREAKING 50/50 I'VE EVER TAKEN, I picked wrong.
Didn't help. I actually did think "well, Spanish is cocina…" but nothing came to mind.seaborgium wrote:Yes. Cocina.TenPoundHammer wrote:Should I know that cuisine is French for kitchen?
I lol'd.Sage on the Hudson wrote:Then pick the other choice next time.TenPoundHammer wrote:I took a 50/50 on Lincoln vs. Holland, and like EVERY FREAKING 50/50 I'VE EVER TAKEN, I picked wrong.
As strong a statement as that is, I don't think it's nearly strong enough. For any three contestants at this level to finish the first round with a TOTAL score of barely $5,000 is preposterous. And I said to my wife during one of the numerous stand-and-stare moments, "they're not missing these because they're bad contestants; they're missing them because the clues are ridiculously obscure." (she agreed) I cashed in on a grand total of one TS during this game (ingenue) so I'm certainly not saying I would have done any better.DBear wrote:The only time I recall was with Oscar Hosts in the UTOC, so at least there was an excuse for this. Since I (and it appears I'm not alone) went 0fer with them, whoever wrote up that category should be fired.thejeopardyfan wrote:Did you guys notice that every clue in Potpourri was a triple-stumper? Anyone know if this has happened before?
edit: http://www.j-archive.com/showgame.php?game_id=163
My first, fleeting thought was John Denver. I then proceeded to convince myself it couldn't POSSIBLY be a posthumous honor, and (surprise, surprise) could come up with nothing else. Not a good night.alietr wrote:Yeah, I hate to say it, but Potpourri seemed symptomatic of the writing being off again. A fair number of mis-valued clues, clues where you had no idea what they were looking for ... blecch.
I spent most of FJ trying to figure out why they would honor him posthumously, but then figured it couldn't be anyone else.
I didn't believe this could possibly be correct, as I-270 circles Columbus OH. Just to be sure, I checked Mapquest and found ANOTHER stretch of "I-270" right where you said.alietr wrote:
Today's fun John Denver fact ... "Take Me Home Country Roads" was written with the Danoffs ("Afternoon Delight") and was inspired by Clopper Road in Gaithersburg, Maryland (then rather rural, now quite suburban and just off I-270), not anywhere in West Virginia.
3-digit Interstates are circumferential, radial, or spur routes whose numbers are duplicated along a main (1 or 2 digit) Interstate's run.John Boy wrote:I didn't believe this could possibly be correct, as I-270 circles Columbus OH. Just to be sure, I checked Mapquest and found ANOTHER stretch of "I-270" right where you said.alietr wrote:
Today's fun John Denver fact ... "Take Me Home Country Roads" was written with the Danoffs ("Afternoon Delight") and was inspired by Clopper Road in Gaithersburg, Maryland (then rather rural, now quite suburban and just off I-270), not anywhere in West Virginia.
I thought there could be only one interstate with a given number. What's up with this?
And even a few 2-digits are duplicated. For instance, there are two Interstate 76s — one from Denver to western Nebraska, and one from Cincinnati to Philadelphia.bpmod wrote:3-digit Interstates are circumferential, radial, or spur routes whose numbers are duplicated along a main (1 or 2 digit) Interstate's run.John Boy wrote: I thought there could be only one interstate with a given number. What's up with this?
Brian
I'm very aware that the 3-digit ones aren't the ones that go cross-country the way I-10 and I-90 do. I simply had no idea an interstate number would be duplicated, even if it is at more than one point along a main I.bpmod wrote:3-digit Interstates are circumferential, radial, or spur routes whose numbers are duplicated along a main (1 or 2 digit) Interstate's run.John Boy wrote:I didn't believe this could possibly be correct, as I-270 circles Columbus OH. Just to be sure, I checked Mapquest and found ANOTHER stretch of "I-270" right where you said.alietr wrote:
Today's fun John Denver fact ... "Take Me Home Country Roads" was written with the Danoffs ("Afternoon Delight") and was inspired by Clopper Road in Gaithersburg, Maryland (then rather rural, now quite suburban and just off I-270), not anywhere in West Virginia.
I thought there could be only one interstate with a given number. What's up with this?
Brian
In most cases, those are highways that are intended to be (or were originally intended to be) connected (to each other) at some point in the future.TenPoundHammer wrote:And even a few 2-digits are duplicated. For instance, there are two Interstate 76s — one from Denver to western Nebraska, and one from Cincinnati to Philadelphia.
My research tells me something I didn't know: They are not (supposed to be) duplicated within any one US state.John Boy wrote:I'm very aware that the 3-digit ones aren't the ones that go cross-country the way I-10 and I-90 do. I simply had no idea an interstate number would be duplicated, even if it is at more than one point along a main I.
The same with I-190 & I-290 around Buffalo NY. The 190 goes north to Niagara Falls, as would be expected, but the loop around Buffalo is called 190 on the south and west portions, and only the north section is called 290.alietr wrote:Three digit Interstate numbers are reused in different metropolitan area. Even number three digit Interstates are generally circumferential and loop routes (usally rejoining the primary Interstate), while odd numbered ones are spurs that head away from the main Interstate and don't return. I-270 in DC does not seem to follow that pattern, of course.
Nor do I-264 and 464 down in Hampton Roads. Then there's the massive I-564, which is all of 3 miles long. I think they just like designating things as an interstate.alietr wrote:Three digit Interstate numbers are reused in different metropolitan area. Even number three digit Interstates are generally circumferential and loop routes (usally rejoining the primary Interstate), while odd numbered ones are spurs that head away from the main Interstate and don't return. I-270 in DC does not seem to follow that pattern, of course.
Trying to remember what the other responses were for that one, but I, too, got Angry Birds and I know I had never heard of Melissa & Doug.Austin Powers wrote:Going back through the episode, I found the Toys category to be much worse. I only answered one of those (Angry Birds) and had not heard of three of the answers.