Reflections on the Box Score Era: On Buzzer Speed and Depth of Knowledge
Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall
- Woof
- Swimming in the Jeopardy! Pool
- Posts: 5130
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:53 pm
Reflections on the Box Score Era: On Buzzer Speed and Depth of Knowledge
Now that we’ve had several months’ worth of box scores to peruse, a couple of trends have emerged. Although it’s axiomatic that success at J! depends critically on your timing with the signaling device, it’s also true that superchamps have been characterized also by attempting to ring in on 40-45 clues per game. This can be contrasted with the typical contestant who attempts to get in on 30-35 clues per game.
Thus, it seems that — in addition to possessing good to excellent timing with the signaling device — most champions and super champions possess a deeper well of knowledge than the average contestant. For those of us hopefuls who doubt our ability to ring in regularly, this suggests that knowing most of the answers should at least keep you competitive.
Thus, it seems that — in addition to possessing good to excellent timing with the signaling device — most champions and super champions possess a deeper well of knowledge than the average contestant. For those of us hopefuls who doubt our ability to ring in regularly, this suggests that knowing most of the answers should at least keep you competitive.
- triviawayne
- Hoping I don’t drown in this contestant pool
- Posts: 2677
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:50 pm
Re: Reflections on the Box Score Era: On Buzzer Speed and Depth of Knowledge
What would the numbers be for someone like me who would probably have a high buzzer percentage, but a lower number of attempts?
Total game show career losings = $171,522
-
- Wet Paper Bag Charmer
- Posts: 2739
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:27 pm
Re: Reflections on the Box Score Era: On Buzzer Speed and Depth of Knowledge
Knowledge is relatively constant, buzzer timing is not. One with superior knowledge always has a chance to win because they can pick off high dollar clues with no competition. Without superior knowledge one is fighting for lower dollar clues against most likely both players instead of one or none. And buzzer timing can change from game to game due to adrenaline, emotions, and two different contestants.
Both styles can win and lose, relying solely on buzzer timing has much higher variance.
Both styles can win and lose, relying solely on buzzer timing has much higher variance.
-
- Also Receiving Votes
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 1:39 pm
Re: Reflections on the Box Score Era: On Buzzer Speed and Depth of Knowledge
Having multiple games under your belt should give you an advantage with the buzzer. If you don’t get the hang of it you aren’t going to win even if you are Ken Jennings.
- Woof
- Swimming in the Jeopardy! Pool
- Posts: 5130
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:53 pm
Re: Reflections on the Box Score Era: On Buzzer Speed and Depth of Knowledge
Against the average contestant, you'd have a shot (80% of 25 is better than 50% of 35) but against the typical champion you'd have problems because they'd be nearly as successful as you on a greater number of attempts. Of course, if you're small number of attempts focused on higher-valued clues, a perhaps unlikely scenario, all bets are off.triviawayne wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 2:56 pm What would the numbers be for someone like me who would probably have a high buzzer percentage, but a lower number of attempts?
- triviawayne
- Hoping I don’t drown in this contestant pool
- Posts: 2677
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:50 pm
Re: Reflections on the Box Score Era: On Buzzer Speed and Depth of Knowledge
Do we have enough typical champions to know 35 is typical? We’ve had a few superchamps in the stats era.Woof wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 4:09 pmAgainst the average contestant, you'd have a shot (80% of 25 is better than 50% of 35) but against the typical champion you'd have problems because they'd be nearly as successful as you on a greater number of attempts. Of course, if you're small number of attempts focused on higher-valued clues, a perhaps unlikely scenario, all bets are off.triviawayne wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 2:56 pm What would the numbers be for someone like me who would probably have a high buzzer percentage, but a lower number of attempts?
Total game show career losings = $171,522
- BigDaddyMatty
- Hoping not to get pruney this time
- Posts: 3300
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:05 am
- Location: Anderson, IN
Re: Reflections on the Box Score Era: On Buzzer Speed and Depth of Knowledge
Excluding Amy and Mattea, the average winner (n=59) has attempted to buzz 34.98 times. The average non-winner (n=182) has attempted to buzz 31.14 times.triviawayne wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 9:58 pmDo we have enough typical champions to know 35 is typical? We’ve had a few superchamps in the stats era.Woof wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 4:09 pmAgainst the average contestant, you'd have a shot (80% of 25 is better than 50% of 35) but against the typical champion you'd have problems because they'd be nearly as successful as you on a greater number of attempts. Of course, if you're small number of attempts focused on higher-valued clues, a perhaps unlikely scenario, all bets are off.triviawayne wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 2:56 pm What would the numbers be for someone like me who would probably have a high buzzer percentage, but a lower number of attempts?
Sprinkles are for winners.
- triviawayne
- Hoping I don’t drown in this contestant pool
- Posts: 2677
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:50 pm
Re: Reflections on the Box Score Era: On Buzzer Speed and Depth of Knowledge
wow. didn't really feel like we had that many already. When I get on, I'll be sure to have a container of sprinkles in my pocket.BigDaddyMatty wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 2:05 amExcluding Amy and Mattea, the average winner (n=59) has attempted to buzz 34.98 times. The average non-winner (n=182) has attempted to buzz 31.14 times.triviawayne wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 9:58 pmDo we have enough typical champions to know 35 is typical? We’ve had a few superchamps in the stats era.Woof wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 4:09 pmAgainst the average contestant, you'd have a shot (80% of 25 is better than 50% of 35) but against the typical champion you'd have problems because they'd be nearly as successful as you on a greater number of attempts. Of course, if you're small number of attempts focused on higher-valued clues, a perhaps unlikely scenario, all bets are off.triviawayne wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 2:56 pm What would the numbers be for someone like me who would probably have a high buzzer percentage, but a lower number of attempts?
Total game show career losings = $171,522
- opusthepenguin
- The Best Darn Penguin on the Whole JBoard
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:33 pm
- Location: Shawnee, KS
- Contact:
Re: Reflections on the Box Score Era: On Buzzer Speed and Depth of Knowledge
I can see the headline at a typical news site now: ATTEMPTING TO BUZZ IN MORE ON JEOPARDY INCREASES CHANCE OF WINNING.BigDaddyMatty wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 2:05 am Excluding Amy and Mattea, the average winner (n=59) has attempted to buzz 34.98 times. The average non-winner (n=182) has attempted to buzz 31.14 times.
Less reputable sites, of course, will go with WIN ON JEOPARDY WITH ONE WEIRD TRICK
- BrigadierSolo13
- Double Double Machine
- Posts: 646
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2019 1:40 am
Re: Reflections on the Box Score Era: On Buzzer Speed and Depth of Knowledge
I tried to click on that second paragraph but it didnt work...opusthepenguin wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 10:55 amI can see the headline at a typical news site now: ATTEMPTING TO BUZZ IN MORE ON JEOPARDY INCREASES CHANCE OF WINNING.BigDaddyMatty wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 2:05 am Excluding Amy and Mattea, the average winner (n=59) has attempted to buzz 34.98 times. The average non-winner (n=182) has attempted to buzz 31.14 times.
Less reputable sites, of course, will go with WIN ON JEOPARDY WITH ONE WEIRD TRICK
- BobF
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 2180
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 3:03 pm
- Location: All over the east coast
- Contact:
Re: Reflections on the Box Score Era: On Buzzer Speed and Depth of Knowledge
Check your antivirus. I got a PM from you saying “Look what I found” and a videoBrigadierSolo13 wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 12:23 pmI tried to click on that second paragraph but it didnt work...opusthepenguin wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 10:55 amI can see the headline at a typical news site now: ATTEMPTING TO BUZZ IN MORE ON JEOPARDY INCREASES CHANCE OF WINNING.BigDaddyMatty wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 2:05 am Excluding Amy and Mattea, the average winner (n=59) has attempted to buzz 34.98 times. The average non-winner (n=182) has attempted to buzz 31.14 times.
Less reputable sites, of course, will go with WIN ON JEOPARDY WITH ONE WEIRD TRICK
Was once hugged by Maggie Speak!