Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

This is where all of the games are discussed.

Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall

Post Reply
TenPoundHammer

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by TenPoundHammer »

skullturf wrote:
econgator wrote:
TenPoundHammer wrote:I thought Presidential Secrets was very obscure. What led to Wilson at $200?
It's well known that Edith Wilson basically ran the Executive Branch due to Woodrow's stroke.
Plus, didn't the clue mention something about the Treaty of Versailles?
I barely even knew that Edith Wilson was a person, definitely didn't know that Woodrow had a stroke, and wouldn't have been within 1000 years if you'd ask me when the Treaty of Versailles was signed.
cosmos
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 478
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 11:56 pm

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by cosmos »

Did you need to know anything besides Texas and president to get LBJ? (W. didn't drink when he was in the office.)

In case it comes up, Nixon liked Chateau Lafite Rothschild.

I was impressed that someone knew doxing/doxxing, which I later learned comes from docs.
MiloTheMayor
Contributor
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:27 pm

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by MiloTheMayor »

MarkBarrett wrote: The clue had me do the math to get to the year 1935. That year meant SSA to me and if it was something else so be it. I was not going to change my response.
For me the tipoff was the inclusion of the number 59 in the clue.

Just watched the game with my wife. We thought the clue for copy and paste was a little misleading. I wouldn't consider copying "craftsy" or whatever that adjective was.
Bamaman
Also Receiving Votes
Posts: 12925
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 1:39 pm

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by Bamaman »

When they didn't finish the baseball category, I said I hoped it would be a triple zero game. Well, I got 2/3 of my wish.

Seriously, congrats to Kristin on a second win and joining the rare group of single player FJ contestants, giving her bragging rights at her house.

I think any New Deal organization would have been a good guess. I joined seaborgium in saying just Social Security and I think it would have counted.

I ran presidential secrets, loved the "he was president in year X" DD. Kristin was just one president off, though.

Wagering in FJ would have taken some thought. Kristin, did you ask what would happen if you bet it all and got it wrong? I assume we'd have three newbies tomorrow, but you never know.

That is a strong category for me and I would have been tempted to be all but a dollar. But with only one game in the bank, I might be taking a closer look at the bottom line and would never fault anyone if they bet zero in that situation when it really is their money they are playing with.

Retro good luck in going for #3 tomorrow. I liked you got the Springsteen bit in you hinted at last week.
Last edited by Bamaman on Fri Mar 13, 2015 8:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
zakharov
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 1049
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:27 pm
Location: NYC

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by zakharov »

TenPoundHammer wrote:
skullturf wrote:
econgator wrote:
TenPoundHammer wrote:I thought Presidential Secrets was very obscure. What led to Wilson at $200?
It's well known that Edith Wilson basically ran the Executive Branch due to Woodrow's stroke.
Plus, didn't the clue mention something about the Treaty of Versailles?
I barely even knew that Edith Wilson was a person, definitely didn't know that Woodrow had a stroke, and wouldn't have been within 1000 years if you'd ask me when the Treaty of Versailles was signed.
Well now you know. Go read up on Wilson's stroke and the aftermath, it's quite a story. Also World War I is important. Isn't learning fun?
4-time pool swimmer - last audition June 2019
Follow me on Twitter @JakeMHS
User avatar
dhkendall
Pursuing the Dream
Posts: 8789
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:49 am
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Contact:

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by dhkendall »

econgator wrote:
TenPoundHammer wrote:I thought Presidential Secrets was very obscure. What led to Wilson at $200?
It's well known that Edith Wilson basically ran the Executive Branch due to Woodrow's stroke.
It was the year here. ("In 1914 Woodrow Willllllllllllllson takes us into World War One.")
"Jeopardy! is two parts luck and one part luck" - Me

"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings

Follow my progress game by game since 2012
Golf
Wet Paper Bag Charmer
Posts: 2738
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:27 pm

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by Golf »

Technically, in this situation there's only two valid wagers. Nothing or everything but a dollar. Any other wager is just giving away value.
MiloTheMayor
Contributor
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:27 pm

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by MiloTheMayor »

Bamaman wrote:
Wagering in FJ would have taken some thought. Kristin, did you ask what would happen if you bet it all and got it wrong? I assume we'd have three newbies tomorrow, but you never know.
Per Vermonter, aka @TheFinalWager on twitter, if all contestants finish with no money or a negative score, three new contestants come in on the next episode. Probably one of the reasons why they have an alternate in the bullpen, just in case.

Agreed with what someone else said, the only two wagers are everything less $1 or zero, and use the clue to give a shoutout to a family member.
User avatar
dhkendall
Pursuing the Dream
Posts: 8789
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:49 am
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Contact:

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by dhkendall »

Bamaman wrote: Wagering in FJ would have taken some thought. Kristin, did you ask what would happen if you bet it all and got it wrong? I assume we'd have three newbies tomorrow, but you never know.
I'm surprised boardies are asking this (Bamaman wasn't the only one), I thought the rule that you need money to win was well known. We've had triple $0 games before (the most recent a couple years ago), they don't have any winners. The same would be here.

I would like to know how Kristen got to her wager too. I am reminded of my daily J! calendar which asks you to wager some of your "winnings" over the week in Subday's FJ! and every week I say "making a wager is pointless, I'm not wagering against anyone! (I appreciate the chance the calendar gives me to practice my trivia for The Call, but I really need somewhere to practice actual wagering for The Call). I just wind up betting a percentage based on my strength in the category and ever week cursing the completely inaccurate method of doing so. (Maybe the should say on the calendars "Final Jeopardy wager given that your opponents have $X and $Y.)
"Jeopardy! is two parts luck and one part luck" - Me

"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings

Follow my progress game by game since 2012
Bamaman
Also Receiving Votes
Posts: 12925
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 1:39 pm

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by Bamaman »

Well, I am pretty certain you can't win with zero, but we've never had anyone crap out in a single player FJ before.
User avatar
BigDaddyMatty
Hoping not to get pruney this time
Posts: 3300
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:05 am
Location: Anderson, IN

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by BigDaddyMatty »

Coryat: $15,800
34 R/5 W
DD: 3/3; Another serendipitous Daytime J!/J! combo, as Daytime J! had a zodiac category that mentioned that Pisces covers (most of) March
FJ: Instaget; entitlements are a pet policy interest area for me, so I knew that the Social Security Act was enacted in 1935
LT: John Tyler (DD), Los Angeles Dodgers (unforgivable!), Pisces (DD), symbolically (I assume this to be an acceptable alternative for "figuratively")
C: Woodrow Wilson

Wow. In the words of Kenneth Parcell, this was quite the clusterwhoops. Losing a potential $5800 worth of baseball and long words makes me want to punch someone in the throat. Figuratively Symbolically, of course.

"Copy and paste" was major negbait, but not nearly so much as "not Giant." Not cool, TPTB.
xxaaaxx wrote:Instaget FJ. Not sure why this wasn't a triple get.
You win the thread, sir.
floridagator wrote:I said optimization when the contestant said defrag. Judges?
IIRC, the clue said something about being named for the fact that it reunites pieces that had come apart or something like that, so I don't think optimization fits.
seaborgium wrote:I said "Social Security" and was stuck for a third word. Is the phrase acceptable in the absence of "Administration"?
The clue specifically asked for the agency, so I'm inclined to think this is unacceptable, but then again, federal agencies are often referred to in shorthand (e.g. "State" or Veterans Affairs"), so who knows?
Sprinkles are for winners.
Bamaman
Also Receiving Votes
Posts: 12925
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 1:39 pm

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by Bamaman »

I don't know about everyone else, but I'm pumped about the $2 off coupon for Aleve coming in Sunday's paper.
cosmos
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 478
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 11:56 pm

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by cosmos »

My reaction after "Giant" got negged: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwQW3KW3DCc

:D
seaborgium
Undefeated in Reruns
Posts: 8961
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by seaborgium »

Today's WoF played out comparably to today's J!. I mean, the final round is always a single-player affair, but the winner was the only one who had won any money when the regular rounds were completed.
User avatar
DHicton
ToC, Class of '07
Posts: 243
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:20 pm

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by DHicton »

So did Stephanie manage to do worse than Wolf Blitzer? Because that actually takes some effort.
User avatar
ÕώÕ
Contributor
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2014 7:51 pm
Location: Washington, United States

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by ÕώÕ »

[quote="MarkBarrett" 8399 seems like a lot to risk on a U.S. Government category just to have the potential of "the moment" of only winning a buck. In Kristin's place I can see 1600 being my wager as well or I would have done the math to hit 30K on the nose with a miss.[/quote]

It doesn't matter what Kristin wagers, as long as it's 0 - 8,399. She could bet a number of things, like $8,000 or $728 or something silly.

I would go big though. Either way you win and come back.
ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ ÕώÕ
Golf
Wet Paper Bag Charmer
Posts: 2738
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:27 pm

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by Golf »

ÕώÕ wrote:It doesn't matter what Kristin wagers, as long as it's 0 - 8,399. She could bet a number of things, like $8,000 or $728 or something silly.

I would go big though. Either way you win and come back.
It doesn't matter what she wagers? Um, you do know this is real money don't you?
User avatar
kristinsausville
2015 TOC'er
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 4:53 pm

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by kristinsausville »

Oh boy.

First I want to say that Stephanie and Brad were both great, smart people (I had just eaten lunch with them, ironically) and I'm not tolerating any trash talking of them on Twitter, FB, etc. I think our strengths and weaknesses overlapped to an unusual degree (I was in my state's geography bee too, although not until 13) and it meant no one could build a big lead. Plus, without going into too much detail, Alex Trebek himself was not crazy about the clues today.
Linear Gnome wrote:Well, that was kind of painful/hilarious. You could kind of see Stephanie lose her composure and never really recover. I don't usually pay attention to the post-game, but I noticed Alex pretend to shake hands with the person at the second podium. I also happened to notice that Kristin is pretty tall--she was taller than Brad (who was taller than Stephanie) and nearly as tall as Alex.
I'm 5'9". :)
econgator wrote:The cut/copy & paste clue is a good example of negbait.
"Negbait" is a term I found myself shouting at my TV repeatedly tonight.
MiloTheMayor wrote:I went with Tennessee Valley Authority, which was stupid I guess.
It came down to an FDIC/TVA coinflip for me. It was almost a relief for me when I found out that both were wrong.
ÕώÕ wrote:Congratulations for Kristin for winning a second time. I wonder why she didn't wager $8,399.
Because I saw how the rest of the game went and I figured that I was unlikely to get it right under the circumstances, even though government is usually a good category for me. I spent much of DJ worried that we were all going to end up in the hole -- although I didn't realize that Brad had fallen back in at the end, hence my shocked face when the round mercifully ended.
bengland wrote:Yes, yes, keeping clam is excellent advice. However, as the number of clues on the DJ board starts to dwindle there comes a point where a player far behind is justified in starting to swing for the fences on every clue. Sure you'll get ridiculed, but if you're really playing to win until the bitter end, it's entirely rational to start ringing in on everything and hoping for a miracle. Take it from someone who's been there.
Yes, thank you. Stephanie played it just right and from what I heard of backstage chatter when I went back to the green room, that seemed to be the prevailing sentiment. At least they didn't give up.
zakharov wrote:Who will sign my petition to make J! change the rules to force contestants to complete the damn sports categories?
I will if you sign mine that if I'm playing, the only pro sport that comes up is football.
MarkBarrett wrote:No matter how well a player expects the J! experience to go there can always be a bit of fear about things not going well. Stephanie's appearance was the nightmare no one wants to have. Kristin: Any memories of what Stephanie had for lunch? I'll guess you had something different?
Don't remember what she ate. I was pleased with myself for putting together a fairly tasty chicken caesar salad, which is generally what I eat at home for lunch.
Golf wrote:Technically, in this situation there's only two valid wagers. Nothing or everything but a dollar. Any other wager is just giving away value.
Thought about wagering everything but a dollar (can't come back with no money). Decided the rest of the game was a bad omen. Figured I'd take a shot at five figures and if I missed, wouldn't lose too much of what I had fought for over the course of that game.
Last edited by kristinsausville on Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:31 am, edited 3 times in total.
Follow me on Twitter: @ksausville
User avatar
heelsrule1988
Sports Jeopardy! Alum/VVL #19
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 2:19 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by heelsrule1988 »

...bruh.

Congrats Kristin but you made me sad by constantly switching away from the sports category. :cry:
User avatar
kristinsausville
2015 TOC'er
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 4:53 pm

Re: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Post by kristinsausville »

heelsrule1988 wrote:...bruh.

Congrats Kristin but you made me sad by constantly switching away from the sports category. :cry:
They made me sad by giving me baseball and not football.
Follow me on Twitter: @ksausville
Post Reply