Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall
- Robert K S
- Jeopardy! Champion
- Posts: 5251
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:26 pm
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio
- Contact:
Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
For well over a century the National Geographic Society has served humanity as a nonprofit organization "for the increase and diffusion of geographical knowledge." The principal vehicle for its educational mission was its publication of National Geographic magazine, the cable channel of the same name, and its associated media properties. Many years ago Jeopardy! began a fruitful partnership with Lindblad Expeditions and National Geographic, which has enabled the show to travel to exotic locations for taping of its Clue Crew clues and provided the show with themed content. Now, the recent sale of control of the National Geographic media properties to Rupert Murdoch's 21st Century Fox sounds the death knell to the not-for-profit motivations of service to education and exploration.
Jeopardy! is a game show and its principal motive is the profit of its owners. National Geographic's media properties will probably continue to provide content of some semblance of quality and educational value, at least superficially. From that perspective there is nothing inconsistent with the missions of the partners and the continuation of the partnership.
I question, however, whether, along with the shift in the National Geographic properties' control and mission, will not also come a loss of credibility and a partisan political taint to the National Geographic brand. It's easy to joke about this sort of thing; dozens of Facebook memes have already made light of it, while illuminating the travesty of the sale more concisely than I do here. It's also easy to ridicule a suggestion, like so many "I'll-never-watch-the-show-again-since-they-had-a-political-figure-read-clues" posts, that Jeopardy! should do one thing or another to avoid appearing partisan itself. But undoubtedly a reason for the partnership was the neutrality and credibility that the National Geographic name lent to anything it was associated with. This reason is now largely gone. In short order, a partnership with National Geographic will make as much sense for Jeopardy! as a partnership with Fox News. I have to wonder if this reality-grounded perception should not alter the calculus by which Jeopardy! will evaluate the sensibility of the continuation of the partnership.
Jeopardy! is a game show and its principal motive is the profit of its owners. National Geographic's media properties will probably continue to provide content of some semblance of quality and educational value, at least superficially. From that perspective there is nothing inconsistent with the missions of the partners and the continuation of the partnership.
I question, however, whether, along with the shift in the National Geographic properties' control and mission, will not also come a loss of credibility and a partisan political taint to the National Geographic brand. It's easy to joke about this sort of thing; dozens of Facebook memes have already made light of it, while illuminating the travesty of the sale more concisely than I do here. It's also easy to ridicule a suggestion, like so many "I'll-never-watch-the-show-again-since-they-had-a-political-figure-read-clues" posts, that Jeopardy! should do one thing or another to avoid appearing partisan itself. But undoubtedly a reason for the partnership was the neutrality and credibility that the National Geographic name lent to anything it was associated with. This reason is now largely gone. In short order, a partnership with National Geographic will make as much sense for Jeopardy! as a partnership with Fox News. I have to wonder if this reality-grounded perception should not alter the calculus by which Jeopardy! will evaluate the sensibility of the continuation of the partnership.
- OrangeSAM
- (Unranked)
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 9:00 pm
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
I'm asking myself similar questions as an NGS member. I don't have any answers yet.
OCSam
- Volante
- Harbinger of the Doomed Lemur
- Posts: 9254
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
Fox also ran the Cosmos reboot. I'd wait and see how much NatGeo changes. (Or until I win one of those Lindblad trips.)
The best thing that Neil Armstrong ever did, was to let us all imagine we were him.
Latest movies (1-10): Everything Everywhere All at Once (10), Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken (6), Black Sunday /1960/ (6), Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (7)
Latest movies (1-10): Everything Everywhere All at Once (10), Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken (6), Black Sunday /1960/ (6), Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (7)
-
- The support is non-zero
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:10 pm
- Contact:
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
Why pass up a chance to bash Murdoch and Fox News?Volante wrote:Fox also ran the Cosmos reboot. I'd wait and see how much NatGeo changes. (Or until I win one of those Lindblad trips.)
- MitchO
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2014 10:19 am
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
Because bashing an entity with a general "Boo! Hiss!" is still not even the tiniest of fractions as the same as wishing physical harm or death upon the other side of the aisle, and this doesn't do anything to prove a point?
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:55 am
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
All this pearl clutching! I'll stick with Nat Geo & I actually just signed up to take a trip to Antarctica with them & Lindblad. I don't recall a bunch of conservatives whining about Jeopardy's association with the NY Times but maybe there's more maturity on one side.
-
- Undefeated in Reruns
- Posts: 8941
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:31 am
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
I guess you don't look at the J! Facebook page.Johnblue wrote:I don't recall a bunch of conservatives whining about Jeopardy's association with the NY Times but maybe there's more maturity on one side.
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 8:39 pm
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
Is this satire?
How would National Geographic get political? Is Koch Industries going to put 40 full-page ads in every issue? Will there be a miniseries on NatGeo on young-earth creationism, or the abiogenic origin of oil? Will Jeopardy have to air on Fox now?
A few major conglomerates control virtually all the media in the US (and Australia, now that everyone's favorite antipodean billionaire has acquired yet another company). Whether they're "liberal" or "conservative" conglomerates is irrelevant.
How would National Geographic get political? Is Koch Industries going to put 40 full-page ads in every issue? Will there be a miniseries on NatGeo on young-earth creationism, or the abiogenic origin of oil? Will Jeopardy have to air on Fox now?
A few major conglomerates control virtually all the media in the US (and Australia, now that everyone's favorite antipodean billionaire has acquired yet another company). Whether they're "liberal" or "conservative" conglomerates is irrelevant.
Hoping for a third lap
- Robert K S
- Jeopardy! Champion
- Posts: 5251
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:26 pm
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio
- Contact:
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
I think you've hit the nail on the head. Mr. Murdoch didn't acquire "another company". National Geographic wasn't a for-profit corporation.sarisson wrote:A few major conglomerates control virtually all the media in the US (and Australia, now that everyone's favorite antipodean billionaire has acquired yet another company). Whether they're "liberal" or "conservative" conglomerates is irrelevant.
The worry is less that the properties will become overtly political--although that could happen in much worse ways than the ones you list--and more that the change in master means necessarily--legally necessarily--a change in behavior, a change in character. Prior to this sale, the National Geographic properties answered to a board of trustees who were obliged to act with the (nonpartisan) mission in mind. Now they are obliged to do whatever Mr. Murdoch commands them to do. You've probably heard that the transformation began this week with the cutting of costs (including mass layoffs) in such nuisance areas as fact-checking and photojournalism. These things tend to be important for an organization respected and admired for education, exploration, and exposing environmental evils such as poaching and deforestation--the sorts of things that used to be the very fabric of the organization. Now, I would guess the focus is likely to be more on entertainment. Anyone with imagination could compile lists of worrisome directions the media entities could take. An obvious direction for the TV channel to take would be to go from the more bona fide educational and documentary material to more reality TV and animal porn. We know that this is the direction a channel in this genre will naturally take under a profit motive because it's what happened to Animal Planet.sarisson wrote:How would National Geographic get political?
-
- The support is non-zero
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:10 pm
- Contact:
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
sarisson wrote:Is this satire?
How would National Geographic get political? Is Koch Industries going to put 40 full-page ads in every issue? Will there be a miniseries on NatGeo on young-earth creationism, or the abiogenic origin of oil? Will Jeopardy have to air on Fox now?
A few major conglomerates control virtually all the media in the US (and Australia, now that everyone's favorite antipodean billionaire has acquired yet another company). Whether they're "liberal" or "conservative" conglomerates is irrelevant.
Well, we all know National Geographic is smut, all those half-dressed natives; disgusting.
- triviawayne
- Hoping I don’t drown in this contestant pool
- Posts: 2677
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:50 pm
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
Pessimist! I think they're half undressed.Vanya wrote:sarisson wrote:Is this satire?
How would National Geographic get political? Is Koch Industries going to put 40 full-page ads in every issue? Will there be a miniseries on NatGeo on young-earth creationism, or the abiogenic origin of oil? Will Jeopardy have to air on Fox now?
A few major conglomerates control virtually all the media in the US (and Australia, now that everyone's favorite antipodean billionaire has acquired yet another company). Whether they're "liberal" or "conservative" conglomerates is irrelevant.
Well, we all know National Geographic is smut, all those half-dressed natives; disgusting.
Total game show career losings = $171,522
- dhkendall
- Pursuing the Dream
- Posts: 8789
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:49 am
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
- Contact:
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
Hey, like pretty much any teenage boy I was looking at National Geographics in my room under the covers with a flashlight. Good times.Vanya wrote:sarisson wrote:Is this satire?
How would National Geographic get political? Is Koch Industries going to put 40 full-page ads in every issue? Will there be a miniseries on NatGeo on young-earth creationism, or the abiogenic origin of oil? Will Jeopardy have to air on Fox now?
A few major conglomerates control virtually all the media in the US (and Australia, now that everyone's favorite antipodean billionaire has acquired yet another company). Whether they're "liberal" or "conservative" conglomerates is irrelevant.
Well, we all know National Geographic is smut, all those half-dressed natives; disgusting.
Spoiler
OK, so I was looking at the maps.
"Jeopardy! is two parts luck and one part luck" - Me
"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings
Follow my progress game by game since 2012
"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings
Follow my progress game by game since 2012
- This Is Kirk!
- Jeopardy! Champion
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:35 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
It's not necessarily the stories they will publish but possibly stories they may decide not to publish now.sarisson wrote:Is this satire?
How would National Geographic get political? Is Koch Industries going to put 40 full-page ads in every issue? Will there be a miniseries on NatGeo on young-earth creationism, or the abiogenic origin of oil?
But, no, I don't think Jeopardy! should end their partnership with National Geographic.
- JonathanHenke
- Loyal Jeopardista
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 9:55 pm
- Location: St. Peter, MN
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
Jeopardy has has so much blatant product-placement lately that I wonder if *this* is the ethical hill to die on. I mean, however far NG falls from its previous quality, Jeopardy is likely already shilling for even shadier organizations.
Washed-up one-time Jeopardy! contestant
January 11, 2005
January 11, 2005
- Volante
- Harbinger of the Doomed Lemur
- Posts: 9254
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
Like Sony Pictures!JonathanHenke wrote:Jeopardy has has so much blatant product-placement lately that I wonder if *this* is the ethical hill to die on. I mean, however far NG falls from its previous quality, Jeopardy is likely already shilling for even shadier organizations.
The best thing that Neil Armstrong ever did, was to let us all imagine we were him.
Latest movies (1-10): Everything Everywhere All at Once (10), Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken (6), Black Sunday /1960/ (6), Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (7)
Latest movies (1-10): Everything Everywhere All at Once (10), Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken (6), Black Sunday /1960/ (6), Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (7)
-
- Loyal Jeopardista
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:33 am
- Location: Atlanta
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
Why is this even an issue?
- This Is Kirk!
- Jeopardy! Champion
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:35 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
^Interesting spelling of the word "literally."
- dhkendall
- Pursuing the Dream
- Posts: 8789
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:49 am
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
- Contact:
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
He meant "littorally", he was talking about the coast.This Is Kirk! wrote:^Interesting spelling of the word "literally."
"Jeopardy! is two parts luck and one part luck" - Me
"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings
Follow my progress game by game since 2012
"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings
Follow my progress game by game since 2012
- jkbrat
- Jeopardy! Champion
- Posts: 1000
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:30 pm
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
"I just threw some trash on the ground," said Tom litterally.dhkendall wrote:He meant "littorally", he was talking about the coast.This Is Kirk! wrote:^Interesting spelling of the word "literally."
There are times I almost think I am not sure of what I absolutely knooooooooo-OW
Learn, Review, Repeat
A Archipelago
Learn, Review, Repeat
A Archipelago
- BigDaddyMatty
- Hoping not to get pruney this time
- Posts: 3300
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:05 am
- Location: Anderson, IN
Re: Should Jeopardy! end its partnership with National Geographic?
Swift response.jkbrat wrote:"I just threw some trash on the ground," said Tom litterally.dhkendall wrote:He meant "littorally", he was talking about the coast.This Is Kirk! wrote:^Interesting spelling of the word "literally."
Sprinkles are for winners.