He's also been smart enough to "STAY CLAM" when clues or even whole categories fall into them. He, like everyone else, depends on the luck of the board to fall his way, but at least he doesn't seem like the sort who would fall into a guess-miss-panic-guess cycle on a bad board. Of knowledge, buzzer, and instinct, someone will have to somehow beat him in at least two things in order to finally end the streak.Linear Gnome wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 7:12 pm He has some curious gaps in his knowledge. It will be interesting to see how long he can ride his good overall knowledge base, killer buzzer timing, and great instincts.
What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall
- zerobandwidth
- That Guy Who Said "Yay!"
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:21 pm
- Location: Virginia
- Contact:
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
Battle of the Brains contestant, 1995-1997
Jeopardy! match 34:13, 2017-09-27
LearnedLeague: PatersonP (LL76: D Summit Div2)
The truth is rarely pure, and never simple.
— from Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest
Jeopardy! match 34:13, 2017-09-27
LearnedLeague: PatersonP (LL76: D Summit Div2)
The truth is rarely pure, and never simple.
— from Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:27 pm
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
Riiiight. Someone is going to prove whether Austin is acting or not?? If you believe it's provable, that's fine.Volante wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 10:36 pmWell, contrived or forced implies Austin is acting. If he is not, then it's not contrived or forced. That's a disprovable opinion right there.Elijah Baley wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 9:59 pmIt’s called a difference of opinion. It’s perfectly ok that you’re entertained and others may find the same thing to be contrived and forced. Or anything in between.hbomb1947 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 9:06 pmYou're acting as if J! has turned into the Austin Rivers -- er, Rogers Variety Hour. Last I checked, we're still seeing 61-ish clues of trivia per game -- a game that Austin happens to be very good at, thereby earning the right to not only keep playing, but to keep playing his way. It's refreshing to have a contestant who's a bona fide original. And I mean, seriously? People have a problem with mime sketches that last all of a few seconds at the beginning of the show?Elijah Baley wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:30 pmIs nuance/subtlety dead or just on vacation? Because I think it’s possible - just possible, mind you - to appreciate someone having a bit of personality while also wondering if the direction of the show is really served by encouraging mime sketches and the like.dhkendall wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:08 pm
You're being contradictory here. For Austin, being himself *is* having fun, joking around with Alex, and releasing tension by doing opening mimes. While I'm not Austin, I wouldn't guarantee I won't do a small little gesture that is more than what most people do because, Jeopardy! is fun! (I sure had fun at my closest experience to the stage - my audition, I can't see me not letting loose a bit (once the initial shock wears off )on stage.
Austin, you be you. I'll continue anxiously awaiting what he'll do next when I watch.
But again, my point is why do you think it's necessary or important to do so?? The thread is specifically a question about what people think, and yet, some folks feel bound and determined to squash or belittle or "disprove" that other points of view are valid. I'd also note there's a certain irony in people who seem to love Austin's non-conformity and yet they practically demand conformity with respect to how Austin is perceived. Odd, that.
- hbomb1947
- Still hoping to get on Jeopardy! while my age is in double digits
- Posts: 2434
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 8:31 am
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
If you've read the media stories about Austin, you'd know that based on the testimony of people who know him IRL, what we're seeing on stage is his authentic self. So no, I'm not impressed by people who assert based on no evidence that Austin's presentation is "acting" or "contrived." You don't have to like his personality; you can prefer boring cookie-cutter contestants if you're so inclined. But don't go making up stuff about his on-air persona being anything other than genuine.Elijah Baley wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:43 amRiiiight. Someone is going to prove whether Austin is acting or not?? If you believe it's provable, that's fine.dd, that.Volante wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 10:36 pmWell, contrived or forced implies Austin is acting. If he is not, then it's not contrived or forced. That's a disprovable opinion right there.Elijah Baley wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 9:59 pmIt’s called a difference of opinion. It’s perfectly ok that you’re entertained and others may find the same thing to be contrived and forced. Or anything in between.hbomb1947 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 9:06 pmYou're acting as if J! has turned into the Austin Rivers -- er, Rogers Variety Hour. Last I checked, we're still seeing 61-ish clues of trivia per game -- a game that Austin happens to be very good at, thereby earning the right to not only keep playing, but to keep playing his way. It's refreshing to have a contestant who's a bona fide original. And I mean, seriously? People have a problem with mime sketches that last all of a few seconds at the beginning of the show?Elijah Baley wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:30 pm
Is nuance/subtlety dead or just on vacation? Because I think it’s possible - just possible, mind you - to appreciate someone having a bit of personality while also wondering if the direction of the show is really served by encouraging mime sketches and the like.
Follow me on twitter, even though I rarely tweet! https://twitter.com/hbomb_worldwide
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:27 pm
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
Again, riiiight. Some friends were interviewed and they vouched for their friend. Shocking!! And apparently, incontrovertible, although I'd say that your evidentiary bar is pretty low.hbomb1947 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 9:11 amIf you've read the media stories about Austin, you'd know that based on the testimony of people who know him IRL, what we're seeing on stage is his authentic self. So no, I'm not impressed by people who assert based on no evidence that Austin's presentation is "acting" or "contrived." You don't have to like his personality; you can prefer boring cookie-cutter contestants if you're so inclined. But don't go making up stuff about his on-air persona being anything other than genuine.Elijah Baley wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:43 amRiiiight. Someone is going to prove whether Austin is acting or not?? If you believe it's provable, that's fine.dd, that.Volante wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 10:36 pmWell, contrived or forced implies Austin is acting. If he is not, then it's not contrived or forced. That's a disprovable opinion right there.Elijah Baley wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 9:59 pmIt’s called a difference of opinion. It’s perfectly ok that you’re entertained and others may find the same thing to be contrived and forced. Or anything in between.hbomb1947 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 9:06 pm
You're acting as if J! has turned into the Austin Rivers -- er, Rogers Variety Hour. Last I checked, we're still seeing 61-ish clues of trivia per game -- a game that Austin happens to be very good at, thereby earning the right to not only keep playing, but to keep playing his way. It's refreshing to have a contestant who's a bona fide original. And I mean, seriously? People have a problem with mime sketches that last all of a few seconds at the beginning of the show?
But it's really not about whether we can get every acquaintance to swear out affidavits to prove whatever point you think can be proved, and instead, what is it that makes you (and others) so uncomfortable with the idea that someone could have a different view and then be determined to try to prove that other view is wrong?? Do you try to prove to people that chocolate is better than butterscotch, for example? Austin has a legion of fans, and yet it's really fascinating that there is this hive mentality that must attack any other viewpoint - he's genuine and fun, dammit, and you better like him or else!!
- Volante
- Harbinger of the Doomed Lemur
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
Because it's not your opinion if you think he's 'acting contrived or forced.' It would be your opinion if you find his personality annoying or irritating.Elijah Baley wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:43 am But again, my point is why do you think it's necessary or important to do so?? The thread is specifically a question about what people think, and yet, some folks feel bound and determined to squash or belittle or "disprove" that other points of view are valid. I'd also note there's a certain irony in people who seem to love Austin's non-conformity and yet they practically demand conformity with respect to how Austin is perceived. Odd, that.
So just say you are annoyed or irritated. I've got no problem with that.
The best thing that Neil Armstrong ever did, was to let us all imagine we were him.
Latest movies (1-10): Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken (6), Black Sunday /1960/ (6), Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (7), The Decline of the American Empire (7)
Latest movies (1-10): Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken (6), Black Sunday /1960/ (6), Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (7), The Decline of the American Empire (7)
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:27 pm
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
No, you accept some opinions that you’ve read and you’re satisfied that something as ephemeral as “sincerity” can be conclusively established. But you’re apparently not satisfied that someone else may have come to a different viewpoint or that they’re unconvinced.Volante wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:13 amBecause it's not your opinion if you think he's 'acting contrived or forced.' It would be your opinion if you find his personality annoying or irritating.Elijah Baley wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:43 am But again, my point is why do you think it's necessary or important to do so?? The thread is specifically a question about what people think, and yet, some folks feel bound and determined to squash or belittle or "disprove" that other points of view are valid. I'd also note there's a certain irony in people who seem to love Austin's non-conformity and yet they practically demand conformity with respect to how Austin is perceived. Odd, that.
So just say you are annoyed or irritated. I've got no problem with that.
Edited to add that whether Austin is genuine or acting or whatever is also just part of the equation. The bigger picture of how this might influence future contestants is part of it, his sportsmanship, etc. And, everyone has their own parameters on how they evaluate a player - I just threw out a couple that came to mind first.
-
- Also Receiving Votes
- Posts: 12898
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 1:39 pm
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
There is a fine line between relaxing and having fun and putting together some pre-planned sketch to draw attention to yourself. If you are entertained by his antics, that's fine with me. They got old for me pretty quickly.
-
- Wet Paper Bag Charmer
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:27 pm
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
IMO, his knowledge base is very good, but by no means great. There seems to be multiple TS's each game that have us scratching our heads.MTGcollegestudent wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 4:10 am Austin's pretty much a broad base of knowledge, like Ken Jennings, David Madden, Seth Wilson, Brad Rutter, Julia Collins, Matt Jackson and Arthur Chu. Basically, we have the Mount Rushmore of spectacular champs...but doubled with the faces on there. With much of a broader base of knowledge, he does have his flaws. We witnessed a few categories that he missed out on, which raises questions for future Jeopardy! players that dare challenge him.
I wonder...do you think Watson would run circles against Austin?
Watson ran circles around Rutter and Jennings, of course it would run circles around Austin. It would run circles around any person.
-
- Jeopardy! Contestant
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:14 am
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
Austin is to Jeopardy what people like Colin Kaepernick and Odell Beckham Jr. are to the NFL. Planned, orchestrated demonstrations in the end zone are what the NFL says it is trying to eliminate (even though for some reason they keep showing them on TV). And Kaepernick and his fellow kneelers are alienating the NFL's fan base, driving down their attendance and TV ratings.
- mikebdoss
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 12:36 pm
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
Except that these kinds of Jeopardy contestants increase viewership considerably, and the show's marketing channels (social media, commercials, etc.) are almost 100% Austin right now - they LOVE him, and don't care if people think his antics are awesome or horrible - they get people watching.joepozz wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:57 pm Austin is to Jeopardy what people like Colin Kaepernick and Odell Beckham Jr. are to the NFL. Planned, orchestrated demonstrations in the end zone are what the NFL says it is trying to eliminate (even though for some reason they keep showing them on TV). And Kaepernick and his fellow kneelers are alienating the NFL's fan base, driving down their attendance and TV ratings.
Jeopardy has done an amazing job over the last 30 years of keeping the format and questions as the real stars of the show. Compare that to many other game shows, which become solid "celebrity" editions or change format every few seasons to dig out of ratings slumps. 2 minutes an episode of Austin being a little wacky is just fine, even if it's not something I'd do.
- Volante
- Harbinger of the Doomed Lemur
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
If anything, they're back with a passion this season. The Eagles mimed a home run hit (while Trout was in the stands) and the Vikings played Duck Duck Goose.joepozz wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:57 pm Austin is to Jeopardy what people like Colin Kaepernick and Odell Beckham Jr. are to the NFL. Planned, orchestrated demonstrations in the end zone are what the NFL says it is trying to eliminate (even though for some reason they keep showing them on TV). And Kaepernick and his fellow kneelers are alienating the NFL's fan base, driving down their attendance and TV ratings.
The best thing that Neil Armstrong ever did, was to let us all imagine we were him.
Latest movies (1-10): Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken (6), Black Sunday /1960/ (6), Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (7), The Decline of the American Empire (7)
Latest movies (1-10): Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken (6), Black Sunday /1960/ (6), Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (7), The Decline of the American Empire (7)
- MinnesotaMyron
- JBOARDIE OF THE MONTH!
- Posts: 3430
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:53 pm
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
Duck, Duck, Grey duck.Volante wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 4:06 pmIf anything, they're back with a passion this season. The Eagles mimed a home run hit (while Trout was in the stands) and the Vikings played Duck Duck Goose.joepozz wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:57 pm Austin is to Jeopardy what people like Colin Kaepernick and Odell Beckham Jr. are to the NFL. Planned, orchestrated demonstrations in the end zone are what the NFL says it is trying to eliminate (even though for some reason they keep showing them on TV). And Kaepernick and his fellow kneelers are alienating the NFL's fan base, driving down their attendance and TV ratings.
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 9:49 am
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
If you followed the NFL more closely, you'd know that group demonstrations were unbanned this season. And I have a hard time believing Beckham is driving down TV ratings, as he's very entertaining to watch, even if I do hate the Giants.joepozz wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:57 pm Austin is to Jeopardy what people like Colin Kaepernick and Odell Beckham Jr. are to the NFL. Planned, orchestrated demonstrations in the end zone are what the NFL says it is trying to eliminate (even though for some reason they keep showing them on TV). And Kaepernick and his fellow kneelers are alienating the NFL's fan base, driving down their attendance and TV ratings.
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:45 am
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
Yes. The NFL eased their guidelines about celebrations. Beckham still managed to draw a penalty by simulating a dog urinating, so there are limits. Anything sexual in nature is still banned as well.Caboom wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:04 pmIf you followed the NFL more closely, you'd know that group demonstrations were unbanned this season. And I have a hard time believing Beckham is driving down TV ratings, as he's very entertaining to watch, even if I do hate the Giants.joepozz wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:57 pm Austin is to Jeopardy what people like Colin Kaepernick and Odell Beckham Jr. are to the NFL. Planned, orchestrated demonstrations in the end zone are what the NFL says it is trying to eliminate (even though for some reason they keep showing them on TV). And Kaepernick and his fellow kneelers are alienating the NFL's fan base, driving down their attendance and TV ratings.
Beckham draws fans with his freakish athletic catches. People shouldn't be able to bend like Beckham and still be able to time a reception. Unfortunately, he is out for the season after breaking an ankle Sunday. And his team, one of only three winless teams in the NFL after five weeks, now needs to win eleven straight just to match last year's record.
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 2189
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:18 am
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
The champ being interviewed on his experience on the show (so far):
http://www.vulture.com/2017/10/jeopardy ... rview.html
http://www.vulture.com/2017/10/jeopardy ... rview.html
- Cat Hammarskjold
- Feline Secretary-General
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:35 am
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
Sorry, I haven't been on the board in the past few days, but I just wanted to say that I have no knowledge about when Austin's streak ends. I would like it to last as long as possible, since I generally like most contestants.triviawayne wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:24 amOr maybe you can because you seem to "know" Autsin's current streak ends in time for the taping of the TOC...Cat Hammarskjold wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2017 9:45 pm Do you think the Jeopardy! producers can do time travel and the reason they made Buzzy Cohen play as "Buzzy" instead of Austin is that they didn't want to have two contestants known as Austin in the ToC?
- Cat Hammarskjold
- Feline Secretary-General
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:35 am
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
I think there are a lot of us who wouldn't be able to stand completely still for an entire episode and probably have some kind of mannerism that we would do. Sure, Austin may be a little more expressive than most of the rest of us, but it's the thing he needs to do to deal with the situation, and there's nothing wrong with that.
-
- Wet Paper Bag Charmer
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:27 pm
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
Anybody who thinks Austin was rude or unsportsmanlike to his opponents needs to watch him give an enthusiastic high five to the victor in his final game. It is amazing how anybody who is different invokes such strong and at times ignorant opinions.
- opusthepenguin
- The Best Darn Penguin on the Whole JBoard
- Posts: 10319
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:33 pm
- Location: Shawnee, KS
- Contact:
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
And prior to that, when Scarlett ran a category, he was pounding the lectern in applause.
- zerobandwidth
- That Guy Who Said "Yay!"
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:21 pm
- Location: Virginia
- Contact:
Re: What do you guys think of Austin Rogers so far? [POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
↑↑↑ This. Haters gonna hate. Having been there in person, it was clear to me that he was just having fun. Combine that with dominating performances and people mistake that for having fun at others' expense. I hope tonight's show puts that to rest.opusthepenguin wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:02 pmAnd prior to that, when Scarlett ran a category, he was pounding the lectern in applause.
Battle of the Brains contestant, 1995-1997
Jeopardy! match 34:13, 2017-09-27
LearnedLeague: PatersonP (LL76: D Summit Div2)
The truth is rarely pure, and never simple.
— from Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest
Jeopardy! match 34:13, 2017-09-27
LearnedLeague: PatersonP (LL76: D Summit Div2)
The truth is rarely pure, and never simple.
— from Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest