Daily Doubles:



trash: esquire DD, Nike, resilient, Cupid,
FJ: Matched Jon (and most of you) with Notre Dame

Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall
It is number one exporter of potassium. Puerto Rico has inferior potassium.Bamaman wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:38 pmI had the Chunnel.
A chance at a tie-breaker is always fun no matter how it turns out. Glad Melis made the right wager. (Or rather, didn’t make the one really stupid wager). Impressed with her speaking, would not have guessed English is not her native language.
Kazakhstan was in the top row above “the capital of Puerto Rico”?
I think the point is that if no foreigners worked on it from the 1500s to the 1980s, then how can the correct respone be a building famously worked on by a notable foreigner from 1984-1989? Saying "we only meant 1500s to 1983" is kind of lame. I don't have a great way to re-write this that fits in the usual restraints of clue length but I think they needed to return this one to the drawing board.davey wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:05 pmI admit I wasn't quite convinced that I knew what the clue was getting at, and I worried that the Pyramid was from the '70s, but I thought Louvre was a good guess (though Notre Dame revealed gave me a shiver of doubt).
I feel a little redeemed from yesterday, when I had the right response and threw it away...
Here's a Merriam-Webster definition of to-
3—used as a function word to indicate position or relation in time: such as
a: BEFORE
five minutes to five
b: UNTIL sense 2
from eight to five
up to now
I'm not too bothered by the clue's wording.
I know there's a Turkish name Aydın complete with dotless i. I can't see the mystery character as that, but food for thought. Edit: she confirmed on Facebook that it's Aydin, with a dot (pronounced like "Aidan" rather than with the Turkish pronunciation).MarkBarrett wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:23 pmMelis added a "Hi" in her FJ! response. It kind of looks like Ayden though I'm not sure about the "e".
Ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! Hee hee hee hee hee. ROTFLMAO!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!twelvefootboy wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:41 pmYou may have more players laying it out there, and even get better DD wagers.
This guy didMattKnowles wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:55 pmI was prepared to answer pied piper but then the clue wanted Robert Browning all of a sudden. Who got that one?
I did; I think there was an excerpt of his version in a book of poetry my siblings and I had.MattKnowles wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:55 pmI was prepared to answer pied piper but then the clue wanted Robert Browning all of a sudden. Who got that one?
If it's all right to say 1500s and not specify a year to begin with - the building has been around since the 12th C.- why is it wrong to give a range of "the 1980s" for when the situation changed? The "terminus" is the event (the hiring of I.M. Pei), not the decade.jeff6286 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:22 pmI think the point is that if no foreigners worked on it from the 1500s to the 1980s, then how can the correct response be a building famously worked on by a notable foreigner from 1984-1989? Saying "we only meant 1500s to 1983" is kind of lame.davey wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:05 pmI admit I wasn't quite convinced that I knew what the clue was getting at, and I worried that the Pyramid was from the '70s, but I thought Louvre was a good guess (though Notre Dame revealed gave me a shiver of doubt).
I feel a little redeemed from yesterday, when I had the right response and threw it away...
Here's a Merriam-Webster definition of to-
3—used as a function word to indicate position or relation in time: such as
a: BEFORE
five minutes to five
b: UNTIL sense 2
from eight to five
up to now
I'm not too bothered by the clue's wording.
Line added, thanks.seaborgium wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:27 pmMelis was a contestant on Master Minds on June 23 last year, winning $1,000.
I agree with this, and I'd take it a step farther. I think the clue writing this season has been notably worse than in previous seasons. There have been all kinds of word clues in all kinds of categories in which a weak definition is given that is somehow supposed to lead you to one specific response, and many, many are vague and poorly pinned. Most of these are regular clues and not FJs, but this FJ certainly fits that description.This Is Kirk! wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:54 pmI thought this game was a dud all around. Just really bad clues overall including FJ.
Another one for Notre Dame, by the way.