Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)

This is where all of the games are discussed.

Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall

merica
Loyal Jeopardista
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 3:11 pm

Re: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)

Post by merica »

The Talking Mime wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 10:41 am
seaborgium wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:00 am I had a sense that Europop in 1976 was going to be ABBA, and that the lyric in question (the correct question, anyway) would be a particularly emphasized one in "Bohemian Rhapsody." I could not think of any title besides "Dancing Queen," and wasn't able to jump around in the song enough: "Scaramouche," "Galileo," "Figaro," and "Magnifico" all came to mind before I hit a wall and started going through lyrics in order and had a fleeting aha with "Landslide"—yeah, not Europop. I'm sorry I missed this one, and if I had been spoiled, I might have credited myself with a get.
Another Landslide!

Yeah, I also figured the clue wanted an ABBA song, but I tried to speed through the Queen lyrics instead of taking a wild guess, and it didn't work out.

I've grown used to Mayim and have no significant issues with her, but Ken is lightyears better than her, IMO. He's killed it again these first two nights.
Landslide here as well. I certainly could have come up with worse guesses, that's for sure!
User avatar
morbeedo
Loyal Jeopardista
Posts: 3065
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 12:58 pm

Re: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)

Post by morbeedo »

'Deaccessioning' is a new entry for me

Also drew a total blank on that 'hedge fund' DD

+1 Dancing Queen - Figured it was ABBA but should have taken more time to see if I could get it
Sherm
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 909
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:39 pm

Re: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)

Post by Sherm »

davey wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:00 pm I was surprised at the triple stump on Never Say Never Again. I guess they are all too young, but the title had an extra meaning at the time because it had Connery returning to the role after ceding it to Roger Moore for 12 years...
Remembered the time frame. Remembered Kim Basinger being a Bond girl. Said Roger Moore every time they gave a wrong answer. Even when Jenning gave the wrong answer of Sean Connery. I was saying Roger Moore.

I guess I had forgetton Connery came back for one movie.
davey
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 6052
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:55 pm

Re: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)

Post by davey »

Sherm wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 1:13 pm
davey wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:00 pm I was surprised at the triple stump on Never Say Never Again. I guess they are all too young, but the title had an extra meaning at the time because it had Connery returning to the role after ceding it to Roger Moore for 12 years...
Remembered the time frame. Remembered Kim Basinger being a Bond girl. Said Roger Moore every time they gave a wrong answer. Even when Jenning gave the wrong answer of Sean Connery. I was saying Roger Moore.

I guess I had forgetton Connery came back for one movie.
He actually came back twice. I did not remember this until I looked it up yesterday but he made Diamonds are Forever after George Lazenby failed to excite the world in On Her Majesty's Secret Service (still, OHMSS is one of the best Bond films, not least for Diana Rigg). Then Roger Moore appeared in 6 films, including Octopussy, which came out the same year as Never Say Never Again, one of the few Bonds not produced by Cubby Broccoli...Then there was one Moore, A View to a Kill...
davey
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 6052
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:55 pm

Re: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)

Post by davey »

Ironhorse wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 8:19 pm I should have come up with it given that I once hosted a TD with a "things mentioned in Bohemian Rhapsody" question. I wonder if there would have been a way to elegantly word the question to specify that the title in question was in fact in Bohemian Rhapsody, because I was trying to go through Queen's entire discography in my head.
I see what you mean here, but it never occurred to me that the clue meant anything other than Bohemian Rhapsody, since it was the song referenced and its lyrics are so iconic, not least because of Wayne's World. I'm sure it's because of that sing-along, rather than any interest in the band itself, that made the words mamma mia come to mind almost immediately...
seaborgium
Undefeated in Reruns
Posts: 8961
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)

Post by seaborgium »

merica wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:24 pm
The Talking Mime wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 10:41 am
seaborgium wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:00 am I had a sense that Europop in 1976 was going to be ABBA, and that the lyric in question (the correct question, anyway) would be a particularly emphasized one in "Bohemian Rhapsody." I could not think of any title besides "Dancing Queen," and wasn't able to jump around in the song enough: "Scaramouche," "Galileo," "Figaro," and "Magnifico" all came to mind before I hit a wall and started going through lyrics in order and had a fleeting aha with "Landslide"—yeah, not Europop. I'm sorry I missed this one, and if I had been spoiled, I might have credited myself with a get.
Another Landslide!

Yeah, I also figured the clue wanted an ABBA song, but I tried to speed through the Queen lyrics instead of taking a wild guess, and it didn't work out.

I've grown used to Mayim and have no significant issues with her, but Ken is lightyears better than her, IMO. He's killed it again these first two nights.
Landslide here as well. I certainly could have come up with worse guesses, that's for sure!
Sorry if I wasn't clear, but "Landslide" wasn't my response; I paused on it and then passed it over in my thought process.
User avatar
Linear Gnome
One Miner Gal
Posts: 2007
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:55 am
Location: Missouri

Re: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)

Post by Linear Gnome »

Ironhorse wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 10:55 pm
DBear wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 8:56 pm

Clammed on arbitrage. :x
I couldn't remember if the word had two R's or not.
I wonder if the name Armitage (as in Young Sheldon) contributed to this confusion.

I did get arbitrage, but did not come anywhere close on FJ!. I keep thinking that '70's songs would be a good category for me, but I'm now 0 for 2 on recent ones. I know all of the lyrics to BR and threw mental darts into various sections, to no avail. About 20 seconds in, I started wondering whether the clue referred to lyrics of some other Queen song.
seaborgium
Undefeated in Reruns
Posts: 8961
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)

Post by seaborgium »

theFJguy wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 1:33 pm Dane Reighard: 16600-9801=6799 (2x = $34,799)
Greg Zona: 4800-0=4800
Hillary Sebeny: 16800-16601=199
I can often make sense of weird wagers that seem to have some sort of strategy to them, but I'm not working out what Dane was going for here. If he's right he has $26,401, but I don't see a reason that Hillary would shoot for $26,400 or $26,399 (or, looking at it another way, leave $7,200 or $7,201 on the table). Greg, if he guards against where Hillary will fall on the minimum cover wager, finishes with a total from $401 to $9,199, and Dane doesn't appear to have taken that into account. And if Dane made a plus/minus mistake with that $1 and was actually trying to finish with $6,801 minimum, is there a reason to expect a wager of $2,000 or less from Greg? Or was he actually trying to leave $4,801 behind and somehow wagered $2,000 less (and $2 more) than he'd intended? I'm just throwing anything I can think of at his wager and not getting anywhere.
User avatar
MarkBarrett
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 16547
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:37 am
Location: San Francisco

Re: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)

Post by MarkBarrett »

seaborgium wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 6:48 pm
theFJguy wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 1:33 pm Dane Reighard: 16600-9801=6799 (2x = $34,799)
Greg Zona: 4800-0=4800
Hillary Sebeny: 16800-16601=199
I can often make sense of weird wagers that seem to have some sort of strategy to them, but I'm not working out what Dane was going for here. If he's right he has $26,401, but I don't see a reason that Hillary would shoot for $26,400 or $26,399 (or, looking at it another way, leave $7,200 or $7,201 on the table). Greg, if he guards against where Hillary will fall on the minimum cover wager, finishes with a total from $401 to $9,199, and Dane doesn't appear to have taken that into account. And if Dane made a plus/minus mistake with that $1 and was actually trying to finish with $6,801 minimum, is there a reason to expect a wager of $2,000 or less from Greg? Or was he actually trying to leave $4,801 behind and somehow wagered $2,000 less (and $2 more) than he'd intended? I'm just throwing anything I can think of at his wager and not getting anywhere.
Hillary has a lock on 2nd as the most Greg can get is 9600. 16800-9600=7200. Or 16800+9600=26400 Dane did 16600+9800=26400? A buck more is 26401? :lol: Or something in that neighborhood?
silverpie
Contributor
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:22 pm

Re: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)

Post by silverpie »

This episode was the second time in the last few weeks that our local station (WTVC/Chattanooga, TN) has shown a rerun instead of the correct episode... anywhere else having this problem?
seaborgium
Undefeated in Reruns
Posts: 8961
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)

Post by seaborgium »

MarkBarrett wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 7:17 pm
seaborgium wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 6:48 pm
theFJguy wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 1:33 pm Dane Reighard: 16600-9801=6799 (2x = $34,799)
Greg Zona: 4800-0=4800
Hillary Sebeny: 16800-16601=199
I can often make sense of weird wagers that seem to have some sort of strategy to them, but I'm not working out what Dane was going for here. If he's right he has $26,401, but I don't see a reason that Hillary would shoot for $26,400 or $26,399 (or, looking at it another way, leave $7,200 or $7,201 on the table). Greg, if he guards against where Hillary will fall on the minimum cover wager, finishes with a total from $401 to $9,199, and Dane doesn't appear to have taken that into account. And if Dane made a plus/minus mistake with that $1 and was actually trying to finish with $6,801 minimum, is there a reason to expect a wager of $2,000 or less from Greg? Or was he actually trying to leave $4,801 behind and somehow wagered $2,000 less (and $2 more) than he'd intended? I'm just throwing anything I can think of at his wager and not getting anywhere.
Hillary has a lock on 2nd as the most Greg can get is 9600. 16800-9600=7200. Or 16800+9600=26400 Dane did 16600+9800=26400? A buck more is 26401? :lol: Or something in that neighborhood?
I like it! Dane takes Greg's max score, adds it to Hillary's current score, and aims to get a dollar above that. It doesn't make sense, but the numbers line up. What he thought he was accomplishing with this wager we'll never know without him saying, but he kept his score above $4,800 and that's what mattered in the end.
User avatar
AFRET CMS
JBOARDIE OF THE MONTH!
Posts: 1764
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:48 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)

Post by AFRET CMS »

morbeedo wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:36 pm 'Deaccessioning' is a new entry for me
I said "deacquisitioning." The word wasn't directly nailed to Knight as a direct quote, so I'm going to count it. I wouldn't be surprised if it was on the sheet as an acceptable response.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/deacquisition#English
I'm not the defending Jeopardy! champion. But I have played one on TV.
davey
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 6052
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:55 pm

Re: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)

Post by davey »

AFRET CMS wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:43 pm
morbeedo wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:36 pm 'Deaccessioning' is a new entry for me
I said "deacquisitioning." The word wasn't directly nailed to Knight as a direct quote, so I'm going to count it. I wouldn't be surprised if it was on the sheet as an acceptable response.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/deacquisition#English
I like the other because it's a syllable less and I'm sure it's more common, but here's a use in Artforum, and that's good enough for me...
https://www.artforum.com/news/wave-of-d ... cerns-9697
User avatar
floridagator
Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
Posts: 2192
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:39 am

Re: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)

Post by floridagator »

Who'da thunk a cast member from The Brady Bunch would go on to become an art critic?

I ran the business vocabulary category. I know that business is the bugbear of trivia mavens. They don't seem to know even basic business and accounting stuff.

I was expecting Hillary to get reversed for saying Miami Herald. That was wrong two ways The category said it had to start with h and had to have six letters.

I took the hint that Europop referred to ABBA but then I went to Dancing Queen. It was their only number one hit in the United States and came out in 1976. What made me think it might be wrong was that Queen was in the clue.

It seems like a snub to Ken that they are announcing him as hosting Jeopardy instead of the host of Jeopardy.
I'd rather cuddle then have sex. If you're into grammar, you'll understand.
bibliophage
Loyal Jeopardista
Posts: 117
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:33 pm

Re: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)

Post by bibliophage »

AFRET CMS wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:43 pm

I said "deacquisitioning." The word wasn't directly nailed to Knight as a direct quote, so I'm going to count it. I wouldn't be surprised if it was on the sheet as an acceptable response.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/deacquisition#English
I also said "deacquisitioning," I also looked it up on wiktionary, and I also gave myself credit for it.
Post Reply