Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall
- MarkBarrett
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 16471
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:37 am
- Location: San Francisco
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
I'm a little slow as it just now hit me while eating cereal that my third precall of Waiting for Godot was out as well since it would not appear in a category American Theater?
- sarah0114
- Jeopardy! Champion
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 11:15 am
- Location: Iowa
- Contact:
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
WDIV has gotten a lot of angry emails! Today's episode will be replayed at 8pm tomorrow if you want to watch it.CrunchyTaco wrote:For the second day in a row, Jeopardy has been preempted in Detroit. Today, it has been preempted for coverage of the autoshow
- sarah0114
- Jeopardy! Champion
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 11:15 am
- Location: Iowa
- Contact:
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Throughout this game and the morning and afternoon practices, Geoff was a really impressive player, so I was shooting for second. It was a lot easier to wager from second place than first because I had nothing to lose.Golf wrote:After Thursday's baseball debacle, I thought Sarah acquitted herself very well in the sports siblings category, especially the Richard brothers.
Naturally Geoff should have rang in on the final clue and guessed anything.
So, two questions for Sarah regarding her FJ wager.
1, why didn't you wager $4000?
2, how did you arrive at the $9999 wager?
- dhkendall
- Pursuing the Dream
- Posts: 8789
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:49 am
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
- Contact:
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
To echo someone else, I did not do well in that category at all either (only got the last one) and found the rest quite obscure. And I'll freely admit to this being that I don't follow sports that much. This doesn't mean they're not obscure though, just not obscure to those who don't follow sports.Golf wrote:OK, you have admitted you know next to nothing about sports. How would you know if the clues were obscure or not? Hint, they weren't.TenPoundHammer wrote:Those Sports Siblings seemed very obscure. I knew Gasol because he was on Wheel's NBA Week last year, but none of the others were remotely familiar.
For example, Elvis Presley is not an obscure name. You could never listen to rock and roll and know who he is. (I'm sure TPH, a non rock and roll listener knows who he is.) Same with the Beatles. Not obscure names because everybody from all walks of life would have heard of them. Not so with many of those sports names.
"Jeopardy! is two parts luck and one part luck" - Me
"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings
Follow my progress game by game since 2012
"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings
Follow my progress game by game since 2012
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:55 am
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Glad the NPR guy lost. Not knowing KGB/NSA was awful. A nice two-player game today. I immediately thought of Salesman but then wondered about The Glass Menagerie which I think is from the late 40's. I did decide to stay with Salesman since I almost always stay with my first instinct.
- sarah0114
- Jeopardy! Champion
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 11:15 am
- Location: Iowa
- Contact:
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
I didn't talk to Geoff about it at all, but I think what was happening was that he thought he'd be stronger in Mayo than Double K and I thought I'd be stronger in Double K than Mayo, but that's not how the clues fell.knordrw wrote:Wow congrats again Sarah! I thought for sure you were done for when Geoff went on that run. Why did you keep going back to Double K when he was answering them right, and he would go to Mayo and you'd answer them right?
Also, what was with Jen's shoes? I saw a tweet to watch the credits for her shoes, but I didn't see anything special....not that they got all that close to see anything really clear.
Jen had on these crazy-tall high-heeled shoes with metal spikes on the toes. She had been concerned about being tall enough at the podium (you don't find out about the lifts until you get there!) and had been wearing the shoes all day while she waited for her turn. I could not have handled those heels! I would have probably tripped, broken an ankle and then impaled myself on the spikes.
- sarah0114
- Jeopardy! Champion
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 11:15 am
- Location: Iowa
- Contact:
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Me too! I had been looking forward to playing against him all day and once we got going and he was just as good as in the practice games, I expected him to win.EndlessEntropy wrote:DAmn I liked this guy and was rooting for him.
- sarah0114
- Jeopardy! Champion
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 11:15 am
- Location: Iowa
- Contact:
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
I was in pretty much the same boat. It seemed too easy but it was all I could come up with.skullturf wrote:As for tonight's FJ, I got it, but only in the flimsiest and most uncertain way. The word "requiem" made me think of death, and I was like, I can name one famous American play that probably came out around 1949 that has "death" in the title. I felt like I was grasping at straws, but it was something. I almost felt like I was just writing it down as a placeholder, just in case it happened to be correct by accident.
-
- Undefeated in Reruns
- Posts: 8941
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:31 am
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
I've found myself wondering recently whether two players have ever run two categories in parallel. Which is to say, for example, Geoff gets Double K for $400 and goes to Mayo for $400, you get that and go to Double K for $800, he gets that and goes to Mayo for $800, and so on. (Of course, there would have to be no Daily Double in either category.) Actually, keeping the criteria much simpler, has anyone ever run a category where they switched categories partway through and someone else came back to it?sarah0114 wrote: I didn't talk to Geoff about it at all, but I think what was happening was that he thought he'd be stronger in Mayo than Double K and I thought I'd be stronger in Double K than Mayo, but that's not how the clues fell.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 9:37 pm
- Location: Bethel Park, PA
- Contact:
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
I pulled Monday's TS FJ completely out of my nether regions for absolutely no reason. My only criteria for choosing what I chose was that it was in Asia and had been communist at one point in my knowledge. I was totally floored when Alex revealed the answer and I was right. I tend to do that a lot on the TS FJs.skullturf wrote: As for tonight's FJ, I got it, but only in the flimsiest and most uncertain way. The word "requiem" made me think of death, and I was like, I can name one famous American play that probably came out around 1949 that has "death" in the title. I felt like I was grasping at straws, but it was something. I almost felt like I was just writing it down as a placeholder, just in case it happened to be correct by accident. I know the name of the protagonist in that play, but I know literally nothing about the plot, and don't know any memorable lines in the play.
It wouldn't be the first time that extremely surface-level knowledge helped me come up with the correct FJ response.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 9:37 pm
- Location: Bethel Park, PA
- Contact:
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
High heels AND metal spikes? That definitely sounds like a recipe for disastersarah0114 wrote: Jen had on these crazy-tall high-heeled shoes with metal spikes on the toes. She had been concerned about being tall enough at the podium (you don't find out about the lifts until you get there!) and had been wearing the shoes all day while she waited for her turn. I could not have handled those heels! I would have probably tripped, broken an ankle and then impaled myself on the spikes.
I can understand not knowing about the lifts. I actually had never even noticed that everyone is the same height until reading about the lifts on this board, so it's not something I ever would have even thought of were I to be on the show. I wonder if they take height differences into account partly when deciding on what contestants to pair for the games.
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:27 pm
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Interesting. If 3rd place had $5000 going into FJ (rather than $1600) vs. your $13200, does that mean you would have wagered $3199 to insure 2nd place?sarah0114 wrote:Throughout this game and the morning and afternoon practices, Geoff was a really impressive player, so I was shooting for second. It was a lot easier to wager from second place than first because I had nothing to lose.Golf wrote:After Thursday's baseball debacle, I thought Sarah acquitted herself very well in the sports siblings category, especially the Richard brothers.
Naturally Geoff should have rang in on the final clue and guessed anything.
So, two questions for Sarah regarding her FJ wager.
1, why didn't you wager $4000?
2, how did you arrive at the $9999 wager?
Looking forward to seeing what happens (retroactively) next week.
Well, if I saw shoes like that on a Jeopardy contestant I'd go "Oh no". If I saw shoes like that on a blind date I'd go "Oh yes". It's all about perspective!knordrw wrote:High heels AND metal spikes? That definitely sounds like a recipe for disaster
-
- Also Receiving Votes
- Posts: 12897
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 1:39 pm
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
I was going to be really ticked if they hadn't finished Tennessee's neighbors and even more ticked if they hadn't used my home state.
I got all but the race car drivers, but I agree the sports siblings were a little tougher than your normal sports category.
I couldn't get a good look at her shoes with the credits roll and the fact she was wearing pants. A
skirt would have made then easier to see.
Death came to me pretty quickly after a briefly waitin for Godot. I remembered from somewhere the play was from the 1940s and being surprised when I learned that because I'd have pegged it as a 1950s piece. Turns out I learned the year from the game Mark linked.
I read the play in college but have never seen it. I vaguely remember the plot.
Normally I do think you should take a stab at the last clue if it can get you a lock. But that is a really tough clue to try and guess a random French place. If a clue has a limited set of answers, all or most of which you know (like presidents or U.S. states), then you should definitely go for it.
I did like Sarah's wager and understand the logic behind it. However, a bigger wager would have been fine as well. She's already won three games, an extra $1,000 isn't as big a deal as it would have been on her first day. So by betting all but a dollar, she'd be risking $1,000 for a chance to win an extra $5,200.
I got all but the race car drivers, but I agree the sports siblings were a little tougher than your normal sports category.
I couldn't get a good look at her shoes with the credits roll and the fact she was wearing pants. A
skirt would have made then easier to see.
Death came to me pretty quickly after a briefly waitin for Godot. I remembered from somewhere the play was from the 1940s and being surprised when I learned that because I'd have pegged it as a 1950s piece. Turns out I learned the year from the game Mark linked.
I read the play in college but have never seen it. I vaguely remember the plot.
Normally I do think you should take a stab at the last clue if it can get you a lock. But that is a really tough clue to try and guess a random French place. If a clue has a limited set of answers, all or most of which you know (like presidents or U.S. states), then you should definitely go for it.
I did like Sarah's wager and understand the logic behind it. However, a bigger wager would have been fine as well. She's already won three games, an extra $1,000 isn't as big a deal as it would have been on her first day. So by betting all but a dollar, she'd be risking $1,000 for a chance to win an extra $5,200.
- sarah0114
- Jeopardy! Champion
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 11:15 am
- Location: Iowa
- Contact:
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Matching of contestants is random and I believe that's one of the things handled by Standards & Practices folks rather than the Jeopardy! staff. And if they had been taking height differences into account, I doubt Jen and I would have been matched up with Geoff! Without those giant heels, she and I are about the same height.knordrw wrote:I wonder if they take height differences into account partly when deciding on what contestants to pair for the games.
- MarkBarrett
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 16471
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:37 am
- Location: San Francisco
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
I paused my recording and tried to find a match for the shoes using Google images. This was the closest I could find: http://www.polyvore.com/jeffrey_campbel ... d=68522210sarah0114 wrote:I didn't talk to Geoff about it at all, but I think what was happening was that he thought he'd be stronger in Mayo than Double K and I thought I'd be stronger in Double K than Mayo, but that's not how the clues fell.knordrw wrote:Wow congrats again Sarah! I thought for sure you were done for when Geoff went on that run. Why did you keep going back to Double K when he was answering them right, and he would go to Mayo and you'd answer them right?
Also, what was with Jen's shoes? I saw a tweet to watch the credits for her shoes, but I didn't see anything special....not that they got all that close to see anything really clear.
Jen had on these crazy-tall high-heeled shoes with metal spikes on the toes. She had been concerned about being tall enough at the podium (you don't find out about the lifts until you get there!) and had been wearing the shoes all day while she waited for her turn. I could not have handled those heels! I would have probably tripped, broken an ankle and then impaled myself on the spikes.
- El Jefe
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 12:26 am
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Was it the CLOSEST or CLOSETS you could find?MarkBarrett wrote:
I paused my recording and tried to find a match for the shoes using Google images. This was the closest I could find: http://www.polyvore.com/jeffrey_campbel ... d=68522210
Jeffrey
- El Jefe
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 12:26 am
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Ditto Sarah, tough sports ones (i.e. beyond my knowledge base).econgator wrote:Congrats on another win, Sarah!
Instaget FJ, seeing as to how I've done the play.
I was pondering how 'off' an answer The Maltese Falcon was. The earliest stage production I can find is in California 2007. Has anyone else heard of it being performed or did Geoff throw in the closest work he recalled timewise?
Jeffrey
- Vermonter
- 2003 College Champion
- Posts: 1956
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 4:57 pm
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
I like to think of my accountant, who's 100 years old. He's a CPA - Crécy, Poitiers, Agincourt - the only three battles you really need to know from that war, in that order.Bamaman wrote:Normally I do think you should take a stab at the last clue if it can get you a lock. But that is a really tough clue to try and guess a random French place. If a clue has a limited set of answers, all or most of which you know (like presidents or U.S. states), then you should definitely go for it.
Regarding a clue from Thursday's game:
Spoiler
Agincourt was the setting for the St. Crispin Day's speech in Henry V. How's that for a tie-in?
Last edited by Vermonter on Sat Jan 18, 2014 1:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Hate bad wagering? Me too. Join me at The Final Wager.
-
- Undefeated in Reruns
- Posts: 8941
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:31 am
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Spoiler about a recent FJ:
I was proud to have gotten Klitschko. That spelling of Wladimir is weird enough (and Polish-looking enough, though the spelling of his last name suggests it's all a German transliteration) to have stuck in my mind on just a few sightings, and brought the surname with it.
Spoiler
Careful, Vermonter!
-
- Just a Man Like Any Other
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:45 pm
Re: Friday, January 17, 2014 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
The name looks Ukrainian to me...